Historical & Groundbreaking Endorsements Compiled:
The Chicago Tribune endorsed a Non-Republican for only the 2nd time in 163-years by supporting Johnson
The Atlantic endorsed a Presidential candidate for only the 3rd time in 159-years by supporting Clinton
The San Diego Union-Tribune endorsed a Democrat for the 1st time in 148-years by supporting Clinton
Detroit News endorsed a Non-Republican for the 1st time in 143-years by supporting Johnson
The Arizona Republic endorsed a Democrat for the 1st time in 126-years by supporting Clinton
Philadelphia endorsed a Presidential candidate for the 1st time in 108-years by supporting Clinton
The New Hampshire Union Leader endorsed a Non-Republican for the 1st time in 100+ years by supporting Johnson
The Cincinnati Enquirer endorsed a Democrat for the 1st time in 100+ years by supporting Clinton
The Desert Sun endorsed a Democrat for the 1st time in 90-years by supporting Clinton
The Dallas Morning News endorsed a Democrat for the 1st time in 76-years by supporting Clinton
The Tulsa World refused to endorse a Republican or Presidential Candidate for the 1st time in 72-years
The Houston Chronicle endorsed a Democrat for only the 3rd time in 70-years by supporting Clinton
The Richmond-Times Dispatch endorsed a Non-Republican for the 1st time in 36-years by supporting Johnson
USA Today gave a endorsement/non-endorsement for the 1st time in 34-years by opposing Trump
The Dallas Voice endorsed a Presidential candidate for the 1st time in 32-years by supporting Clinton
Wired endorsed a Presidential candidate for the 1st time in 25-years by supporting Clinton
http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/the-wrap/article/Donald-...
so everyone is stupid in your opinion?
These are great days we're living, bros.
I'd much rather that people vote for Clinton because they made up their own mind and decided she was the better candidate, not because "well everybody told me to so I guess I better do what they say". That's scary.
No, I do not think it is a problem for any person or editorial body to share an opinion. I do not see it as a form of mind control to be exposed to other people's worldview. And Trump is exactly as hideous a human being as everyone has pointed out, besides being a deeply flawed candidate who is in over his head and has no capability to deliver on even a fraction of (what little) he has promised.
"Endorsements might taint the objective reporting we were trying to do in the rest of the newspaper. Moreover, [USA Today founder Al Neuharth] felt it was elitist to assume we know better than everyone else when it comes to voting."
[1] http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/10/04/disendorsem...