>Take this example: A regulation says...
Then the regulations are faulty and need updating to be on par with reality.
Then the regulations are faulty and need updating to be on par with reality.
As for circumvention: are you concerned about ensuring a complete communication paper trail or protection from insider threats?
In this case, the endpoint by necessity is physically accessible to the possible adversary, which means they have a whole host of methods for disabling monitoring software. It's much harder to interfere with a box which you don't have physical access to that is listening in on your communication, and which simply drops any data it cannot intercept.