The Traditional Venture Capital Model Is Broken: What’s Next?
thesecurepc.com
thesecurepc.com
As I understand it, the current model is that the people with money give it to the venture capitalists, and that it's the VCs who are the ones who interfere with the start-ups.
Presumably the idea would be that the "collective" would have on-staff consultants who both advise the start-ups and who convince investors that, in aggregate, the start-ups will make money.
Though I think the real problem with the VC model is the necessary "hockey stick" profit chart. The fact that a "lifestyle business" is considered a failure means that lots of functional, profitable businesses are forced to grow to the point that they really do fail.
I'm not quite sure where you are quoting from.
In my model, which I call the Entrepreneurial Collective, there is no distinction between entrepreneurs and investors. There is no such thing as an 'outside investor.'
My goal is to create a model in which there is only one role (entrepreneur/investor) and no one has power over anyone else.
I think what's next is this: http://me-vc.com
Companies have to register in Jersey (the island, not the state), and there are some other legal and regulatory hurdles to overcome, but the future is definitely in micro-equity.
When is me-vc.com going to launch?
If you want to know more or be part of the private Alpha, just email me (the address is in my profile).
Hugging is extremely important as I argue in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PemCDigV680
xo
The work of Nobel Peace Prize winner Muhammad Yunus is a great example of an alternative to the standard VC model. It gives me hope that we can do better.