In reddit's case they were providing real content, just created by them. In this case the content is completely fake.
I also think this would be harmful to the business. I have very few interactions with a service before I make a judgement on them, if most of my interactions go nowhere (as would be the case if they are fake) I would stop using the service.
However if the service was just slow I would be likely to still use it, just check it less frequently.
Of course one viable way of adding content would be to repost content from other sites - with suitable indications of course.
Having people waste time bidding on fake projects that have no chance of happening is not the same end product as a realistic site where projects are posted by real people and have a chance of happening.
Also I'll tell you from experience: Even if your product is 100% real people who lose their bids are going to think it is a fraud. If you site actually is a fraud you are just going to burn through all the early adopters extremely quickly. The strategy should be the opposite --- have the content be so good that early adopters feel like they've hit a goldmine.
OP should consult a lawyer about the relevant legal and licensing requirements for running a recruitment agency.