Building an $80k/month business with a software testing community
indiehackers.com
indiehackers.com
You've discontinued testing services, but I think there is a big market out there. We've been looking for a platform where we can list our website & its high level use cases, and then 1 or more testers can test it out thoroughly. We've tried sites like MyCrowd in the past, but didn't get a great result from them. Most testers just submitted cosmetic bugs and weren't as detail oriented as we'd like.
I'm sure there would be other startups who have similar needs for getting their sites/apps tested and can easily pay for such a service.
Are you (or anyone else here on HN) aware of any good testing services out there or a place where we can find good freelance testers?
Quality testing has been our #1 priority and we have made huge steps forward providing on-demand testing for our 450+ startup and enterprise customers.
Would welcome the opportunity to impress you at https://mycrowd.com
Yeah, it's been a while since we used MyCrowd. Good to know it has improved a lot since then. Will check it out again.
Testing is funny because there's not really the same kind of freelancers out there for testing as you get in the designer/programming/tech world. Most testers are either full time employed or work on full time contracts. There are freelancers, but there should be more.
Asfaik - there isn't a place to find good testing freelancers. We have a job board on our website, or sometimes I try to recommend people.
From a client's perspective, we are looking 'vetted' testers who are detail oriented and can be relied upon for a thorough job.
My email address is in the HN profile. Feel free to contact me in case you'd like to discuss this further.
Wish you a lot more success in the future!
We then convert those videos into tests that are merged into your repository as a part of your CI process.
@luckystrike - a friend of mine runs 10g-force.com and they have a very thorough testing process.
Ministry of Sound logo:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/27/Ministry-of-s...
The logo this company (Ministry of Testing) is using:
https://www.indiehackers.com/images/business-icons/ministry-...
1) The Ministry of Sound logo is imitation of an official government ministry logo anyway, eg https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/the-office-of-th... or https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations
2) The Ministry of Sound changed their logo: http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/new_logo...
2. Doesn't mean other people can use their "old" logo (which they're currently still using).
FWIW, I'm no fan of MOS (one of the reasons I posted is because they're notoriously litigious, even suing Spotify over the order of user playlists), but I'm also no fan of design work being so blatantly ripped off, particularly by companies that can easily afford to hand work to a real designer.
The Ministry of Sound logo is a derivative of the crowned portcullis logo of the Parliament of the UK - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_of_the_United_Kingd...
No they aren't. The MOS logo uses emblems of the British state (crown and portcullis) to create a design that's completely different from that of any British state institution, as demonstrated by your own example.
The logo of "Ministry of Testing" is not inspired by any Government emblem, it's literally just the MOS logo with one word changed and a ninja instead of a portcullis/speaker.
A company that makes $100k/month and brags about its "uber cool" design should be able to do better than that.
And people wonder why so many clients feel entitled to free creative work.
That said, they seem to have good growth and the project is nice.
However, I believe it's incredibly misleading and irresponsible for indiehackers.com to only report revenue. While these testimonies serve as great motivational material, some developers who lack the background to do market research may begin spending copious amounts of time on similar "indie projects" that will most likely not sustain them.
That's not to say developers shouldn't try. But, indiehackers is only providing numbers in terms of revenue; maybe projections to profitable would be more responsible.
Looking at the comments on HN that have been posted over the last few articles (ex. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12575665), people are not only using the site for motivation, they are also using it for market research.
It's a big difference from other mainline news sites that seem to be only interested in unicorns or startups with millions in funding, or keep talking about the same dozen startups week after week.
Disclaimer: I have a startup, was interviewed by IndieHackers, and am listed on their site.
For readers (particularly developers interested in starting their own business), it's a source of inspiration, motivation, and community. There aren't many (any?) other places you can go online and read this many founder stories, complete with revenue stats, for smaller non-unicorn businesses.
For the people who agree to be interviewed, it's definitely free marketing for their businesses. It's also a chance to share their story, their successes, and their advice with the world. When you've been toiling away for years (likely in obscurity), sharing feels great.
So it's a win-win, really.
If someone reads it and it generates some interest, marketing started!
It's incredible looking at the revenue breakdown just how much 'training courses and events' were bringing in compared to the actual 'testing services'.
I'm launching 2 free and open-source toolkits for Web designers/developers next month and your revenue breakdown has convinced me that my initial plan of monetizing on training is probably the way to go.
Do you have any specific tips on how you built up that initial community (besides setting up the forum)? What were some of the specific tactics you used to draw those initial users in?
I try to find ways that help testers and I keep doing it consistently (even if it gets really tedious).
One example is me maintaining a feed for testing related blogs. Testers can either submit or if I find a new one I add it to our feed. The feed gets shared publicly, but then I also socially share some of the blog posts. People often explain their spike in traffic as the 'sherry' effect :)
I ask for nothing in return, I do it as a way to try to grow and bring the community together.
Often jobs/projects get posted on various freelance type sites, but tbh they attract such old school type of testing/testers that it's just not worth it. Unfortunately as testers we still suffer with a bad image, I'm trying to change that.
There are a bunch of other crowdsourcing type sites, but either they don't hire proper testers, or if they do then their model is to own the relationship. It kinda sucks.
but you can look for alternatives of course.
Update: For the down votes are you serious?
Yes. A comment that proudly states that you haven't read the article and then goes on to offer derogatory drive-by criticism is pretty much the anti-thesis of a valuable contribution to the community.
Now I even shoved it into smmry to get the general gist of the article and even smmry after condensing the article down to 14 to 20 sentences didnt even look very appealing (to me the reader).
Congratulations are in order for what she achieved and with a small family it is even more remarkable.
The problem I mostly have about the article after coming back here was I got more knowledge about her as a person and the company than the damn article she wrote. Though I will never know because the whole thing just read like a marketing blog post.
The `serious` is more in line of `you got to be joking me` that some people take things way too seriously.