Gender pay gap in modeling
bbc.co.uk
bbc.co.uk
But this simple understanding gets thrown out of the window as soon as jobs are involved. For example males playing football make much more money than their female counterparts; simple logic tell us it's because people like to watch the athletes of top psyche, it's just that they happen to be male thanks to evolutionary predisposition. Males have more strength in the majority muscles in humans and most mammals (only exception is buttocks and upper legs). But no, people likes to immediately assume it's because sexism, a "they against us" mentality where it must be patriarchy or misogyny instead of looking for the most simple explication driven by the market.
And then if you make an average of how much women make and you happen to inclue athletes then this disparity will show up, and people will say stuff live "look women make 77% of what men do, sexism!" Instead of looking at the million variables, conditions of each gender and how they relate to every possible occupation/job field.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_sex_differen...
Some random quotes from the wiki article:
"Several studies have shown the hippocampi of men and women to differ anatomically, neurochemically, and also in degree of long-term potentiation."
"In accordance with the sexual dimorphism of the amygdala, the right VPMC is more dominant in an active limbic system for males while the left is more dominant in females. These differences carry out to a behavioral level."
"Positron emission tomography studies have shown that men and women ranging from the ages of 19 to 32 years old metabolize glucose at significantly different rates in the orbital prefrontal cortex. Infant males who exhibited lesions on their orbital prefrontal cortex struggled with object reversal experiments, but females exhibiting such lesions did not have impaired performance in object reversal."
Entirely? That's an incredibly strong claim. Do you have any evidence for this assertion? Is such an assertion even plausible, if you are objective about it?
Maybe we are only allowed to discuss 'pay gaps' that have direct relevance to the software industry.
- can gain entry into the most secure places in the world
- don't think for themselves
This would be a rational explanation. Of course the real explanation is misandry!