In the way, it didn't happen out of the blue or didn't release radioactive cloud on other parts. Chernobyl happened during routine testing. Fukushima, took a highly destructive Tsunami to meltdown.
Extreme nitpick: the test which caused Chernobyl to explode was unauthorized, reckless, and far from routine. But this doesn't change your point overall.
Everyone knows a tsunami caused Fukushima, the question is 1) what are the health implications of it and 2) can it ever be contained? The answers seem to be 1) we can't measure (it now) and 2) no.
If "we can't measure" is true, that's extremely strong evidence that the effect is not very large.
Are you sharing an article, or an agenda?
I'm not the one making bad faith arguments like 'the only negative result is public distrust of nuclear plants'