Both, probably.
I've heard the argument that because health care (or insurance) is a necessity of life so it should be provided by the government. Why doesn't the same principle apply to food?
I've heard the argument that because health care (or insurance) is a necessity of life so it should be provided by the government. Why doesn't the same principle apply to food?
It does, as well as access to water and shelter. Did you think universal health care was the "final boss"?
We as a country have more than enough resources that people shouldn't have to starve on the streets if they happen to go bankrupt.