I get the desire to start fresh, but that's a lot of established traction in a very crowded market to just throw away.
I get the desire to start fresh, but that's a lot of established traction in a very crowded market to just throw away.
I was wondering that too. I honestly suspect some executive in Google's team wanted to have more visibility, team and power.
So...Google Buzz.
If they want something really innovative, bring back open standards and a federated IM protocol. We went from AIM/Yahoo/MSN to XMPP .. and back to Google/FB. It feels like a regression.
Edit: Oh and more recently Discord has taken over my friend group's urge to talk with voices.
"path\to\chrome\chrome.exe" --app=https://www.messenger.com
Edit: Actually testing that, that's actually pretty neat. I'm going to do that when I get home!
So why doesn't it get more love from Google?
UI? I write things, and they appear in front of someone else. Even my technophobe mom has no problems with it.
Tied to Google... well, yeah. But you kind of need some kind of 'account' for chat apps.
I remember when 'Whatsapp' came out and people mentioned that it didn't have a web interface. I won't use anything that I can't type into when I'm at a computer - pulling out my phone and t-y-p-i-n-g out a message is just a non-starter.
The UI lags hard for me during common operations, such as opening the app, and sending messages; often there's a several second lag between pressing the send button, the entry field blanking, and the message finally showing up in the conversation w/ UI indicating that it's in the process of being sent.
And occasionally, yes, I out-type the app & phone's ability to process keyboard input. My phone is a bit old, but that seems like an excuse more than anything; I don't really understand why it's so hard for a device w/ a processor that measures its speed in GHz and RAM measured in GB to keep up with a single app whose job is to send text messages.
But alas, the phone world's opinion is that I should upgrade to the latest and greatest $400-$600 phone every 18 months.
Not only that, but when I've explained these issues to my friends they respond with the same response you gave, down to the 'weird.'
And the name is stupid. When I used to encourage people to use Hangouts, I always had to explain the name. Talk is a great name and they should have gone back to it for Allo.
> why isn't Allo just Hangouts 3
Ghost of Emu in the machine [0][1][0]: https://techcrunch.com/2013/10/22/emus-android-texting-app-m... [1]: https://techcrunch.com/2014/08/06/google-acquires-emu-an-im-...
While I agree with first two, Hangouts was a terrible brand with a bad rep on UX (too slow on Android, complex UI etc), it was kind of like Google's Internet Explorer. They had to get rid of the brand for consumers at least especially younger ones that are the prime target (the Snapchat generation if I may say). I agree though that Hangouts has a better reputation with the corporate world even though Slack is kind of eating their lunch minus the video part where they're still king I think.
These 2 new apps are destined to fail
I still use hangouts cause it's linked with Gmail ... but I hate it cause it's slow and unreliable
http://www.androidpolice.com/2016/08/16/google-planning-focu...
One possible explanation: internally Google eats their own dog food. When I was a contractor there, everything ran on gmail, gooogle docs, and hangouts. Perhaps they wanted something better for internal use, and now we get to use it also?
The same reason Duo isn't.
Both are substantial departures from what Hangouts was, with some overlap, and calling either Hangouts would create incorrect expectations.
From what I've read Allo will become the casual messaging app, and Hangouts for work. Google probably wants to compete with Slack and similar offers.
I wouldn't be surprised if at some point Google allows Allo and Hangouts to communicate.