Chinese factories are lying and they don’t even know it
assembly.com
assembly.com
The topic itself is interesting but without real and unbiased raw data on defects, it is hard to even discuss it.
(1) Sorry for the bugs -- misconfigured subscribe tool has been removed and you can use http to access the site as there is an issue with the https config on the new landing page
(2) Graphs have the axes explained in the text. Removing them from the figures was recommended as a marketing hack, but very ill-advised. I'll get the figures updated within the next half-hour or so
(3) Advertisement? Sure. But... also a huge dataset and an interesting finding about the relative perceptions. It's not a scientific journal article by any means (I've written some), but it does outline how the data was put together. If anyone is interested in collaborating on a deeper study, I'm very happy to do so!
..and there all my preconceptions of marketing people sadly reconfirmed.
Graph without labeled axis: check
Veiled production promotion: check check check
Goes to show how easily HN can be gamed with a well thought headline.
On top of that, the infrastructure for manufacturing exists in China.
To give an example:
You have a factory that makes a complex device. In theory, that factory can be brought over to the US just fine, and ran with US employees at a very comparable cost. (Trained technicians in China are not as cheap as you may thing!)
But, let's say you use an adhesive. Well that adhesive is sourced from China. And the glue machine used to apply the adhesive is also made in China. If you run out of glue, or a batch goes bad, or you need to reformulate it for some reason (which is going to happen a lot during pre-production in the very least!), then you have to go back and forth with the Chinese manufacturer of your adhesive, which may include flying personnel out, getting multiple batches of new adhesive formulas through customs, and so on and so forth.
In comparison, if your main factory is located in China, then the adhesive factory is right down the road.
The infrastructure argument is the same as for why startups happen in Silicon Valley, at first glance the location may not be optimal, but all the surrounding services smooth out all the details.
Sources: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42135.pdf http://www.bls.gov/fls/china.htm
And Foxconn buys all their automation technology in Germany ;)
Most articulated robots are manufactured in (unsurprisingly) Germany, Japan and South Korea.
Look at how China is investing in Africa. In this hypothetical future, I can still see a country with large amounts of robotic equipment, lots of people educated to operate and program them, and good shipping infrastructure dominating global trade.
It will just be a highly developed China shipping to developing nations, instead of a developing China shipping to developed nations.
You can plug in your choice of robotic manufacturing country for China if you'd like, the point stands, but I see China as well positioned to maintain their lead in manufacturing if they are very smart.
It's really just an advertisement without any data or information that could be taken seriously.