http://www.theitbaby.com/wordpress/2016/01/25/they-wanted-to...
http://www.theitbaby.com/wordpress/2016/01/25/they-wanted-to...
> A supposed child psychologist set them alone in a city by themselves with noone to talk to, no one who cares.
> The point is even if you believe the study to be true, it was unethical. Kids were unsupervised and let loose.
I lived in Moscow, Russia from birth to right before I turned ten. Towards the end, when school let out, I'd get on a bus or subway, and I'd go home to our apartment. Unsupervised, alone, "loose". Sometimes end up playing with friends living in my apartment complex, sometimes I'd just spend time by myself in the apartment. And I was not an outlier in this; this was common among my friends. There wasn't a school bus that would shuttle us to our front door, nor did most people's parents pick them up in 4th grade.
I was nine. The supposed kids being experimented on in this article were teenagers, between 12 and 18.
The idea that allowing teenagers to be unsupervised in a city is dangerous or unethical is ludicrous.
Or did they or society degenerate from medieval times that much?
My high school-aged daughter went without it for a few weeks on a trip and didn't die, amazingly. She wants to go back and do it again.
A school trip mean you have other friends with you.
I copy paste the url from damian2000's comment here for you convenience:
https://snob.ru/profile/5591/blog
She also blogged about the continuation of her experiment here (2014):
https://snob.ru/selected/entry/79799
2016 and it comes to the English-speaking media, here Feb 2016, where the New Paper from Singapore tried to reproduce the experiment:
http://www.tnp.sg/news/singapore-news/what-happens-when-5-st...
I wonder if perhaps misdirection would change things? "You have 8 hours of this remaining" would make one very conscious of the experiment, and when it finishes.
They'd know if the experiment is misdesigned if they cannot envision teens staying sane for this long.
* The number is low, only five, but I think it's enough for an informal experiment of a newspaper (not a peer review article)
* They don't have a control group. What happens if you must log all your activities for 8 hours and feel that someone is looking over your shoulder? (Can you be with your SO?)
* It's not a 100% reproduction. It's nice that here the children were allowed to talk with families/friends, instead of being forced to be alone or with unknown people.
* No suicidal thought. Perhaps the problem with the other experiments was the isolation? Did the subjects in the other experiment have suicidal though before the experiment? Was the suicidal part exaggerated? For example:
- "Do you think that you can survive one week in the conditions of this experiment?" "No, I'd kill myself. (as a figure of speech) [1]"
- "Did you think about suicide?" "No" "Not even a little?" "No" "Not even for one moment?" "OK, whatever, perhaps only once."
* I think that an important quote is:
> "When I wanted to play the guitar, I didn't have my phone to search for new chords. Luckily I had some chords printed out already," she said.
Perhaps doing a two hour rehearsal and repeating the experiment one week after will remove most of the problems due to the lack of preparation. It's like trying to go to a camping without previous experience. You will put the cans, but forget the can opener. (Been there, done that.)
[1] I'm a native Spanish speaker, so I don't know the exact idiom in English. In Spanish from Argentina we sometime use phrases like "Cuando se me cayo el florero me quiería morir." -> "When I drop accidentally the flower pot, I wanted to be dead." but everybody understand that it's a figure of speech and not a real suicidal feeling. I'm not sure how to translate the exact feeling with the right idiom to English. I even had to add the word "accidentally" to the transition to make the first part of the sentence clear.
https://www.amazon.com/Ekaterina-Murashova/e/B00MWS9SN8
http://www.samokatbook.ru/files/Samokat_catalogue2008.pdf
Edit: Seems like you are questioning if the author actually carried out the experiment that she claimed. In that case there is indeed no proof or cross-reference available.