As far as I know the Google claims were shown to be false. Have I missed something?
https://sputniknews.com/us/20160912/1045214398/google-clinto...
NOTE: The site is an organization sponsored by Russia. But the researcher is well respected with a Ph.D. from Harvard. His 2015 paper was published in PNAS and reviewed by very respectful people. This article is a preview of his upcoming paper.
Where did you see this proven to be false???
It's sad how critics and whistleblowers have media blackout in USA and only can do it via Russian agencies or Al-Jazeera.
And he lacks basic understanding quite often. In one example, Google pulls a Hillary image instead of a Trump (or both) when referencing the 2016 election in a fact card. He doesn't even think that image is simply the first to appear on that page.
Heck, I type "next president" into Google right now and I get a fact card with Obama as the image and "5 Reasons Why Trump Will Win" by Michael Moore as the top result.