Downside of Bitcoin: A Ledger That Can’t Be Corrected
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
Examples of such assumptions: Bitcoin transactions in the blockchain can never be annulled, removed, or hidden from view; Ethereum contracts cannot be modified or voided by third parties (e.g. a judge).
Unfortunately, removing immutability from the blockchain turns it into something that isn't more trustworthy than any other kind of ledger -- so what's the point of using it? So, I don't expect this kind of technology to be viable for mainstream banking, or any other use case where the real-life legal system gets involved.
> removing immutability from the blockchain turns it into something that isn't more trustworthy than any other kind of ledger
How is that in any way true? Immutability means you have a record of the real data and when it occurred. Other applications can be layered on top.
Feature, not a bug. Same goes for Bitcoin and the government's inability to print shekels on demand.