HP’s Slate Device
h20435.www2.hp.com
h20435.www2.hp.com
Your list isn't an objective "everything it's missing", it's a subjective "what you wish the ipad to have".
Question is, do you wish that unreservedly, or only if it could be done without 'ruining it'?
If I expected it to operate as a razor and it could not while other similar devices did have that feature, then yes, I would say shaving capability was missing. That doesn't mean every irrelevant concept I can come up with would be called missing, though. 'Missing' is based on what one would expect, desire and can get elsewhere.
The one is a universal tablet format computer the other is a media consumption device.
Steve got it wrong, BTW. Having a SDHC slot on the device is more minimal than having to attach a dongle.
The iPad has only given me a few annoyances so far. I miss resizable textareas.
I swore I would never buy HP again but was given a second HP laptop. It was the TX 1000, which you may have heard of. It over heats and there are thousands of customers whose laptops just die when the connections in the machine melt from the heat. My laptop averages 113 Celsius. Of course, HP will not do a recall.
In short: do not buy an HP due to terrible hardware and unimaginably poor customer service.
I bought a tx2000z for my daughter - convertible tablet with touchscreen and pen. Works alright, but wow does that thing get hot! The fans are constantly on, and its painful to touch.
In talking to HP people, I've found out some of their international support (say, Latam) is nearly non-existent. Dell, OTOH, has done next day replacement on disks and screens even when I'm travelling.
Any suggestions on non-HP tablets?
HP has been hit-and-miss for me, some devices literally work forever and are great, others are defective by design. It's weird.
At 1:40, you can see him use a website. It looks like a standard Windows 7 touchscreen (notice a tooltip comes up over the play button after he's clicked -- the "cursor" stayed there I guess).
For me, Windows 7 touchscreens mean the number one issue is targeting UI elements and entering input. Closing a browser tab with a 16x16 pixel target isn't too hard with a mouse. But on Windows 7 touchscreen it can be frustrating.
Because of this, I like having a convertible tablet, so I can quickly use the mouse and keyboard when needed.
Aside from the UI alone, this would have to answer each of these in order for it to compete with the iPad.
Engadget showed images of a HP Slate on 2010-01-06, http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/the-hp-slate/
Whilst Engadget were still publishing rumours about an Apple Tablet, http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/20/apple-rumor-roundup-summe..., 2 weeks later. Apple announced their tablet 3 weeks after HP at http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/27/live-from-the-apple-table....
Not conclusive proof but to say that HP were waiting to see Apples spec is wrong; unless you're considering industrial espionage.
Similar info graphically http://www.google.com/trends?q=%22hp+slate%22%2C+%22apple+ip...