Hacker News Reader

My reading of the article is that they have to stop listening when everyone listed on the warrant leaves the call, not when there exists a non-warrant-listed person on the call.

That is, they can listen during OR of isOnWarrrant(), not just the AND.

View on HN

So everyone gets a text-to-speech victim, listens to the conversation, but at gun point writes down something and makes their victim actually say it. Nobody talking on the phones is part of the conspiracy.

I would guess that if someone is saying the exact words they are given it would count as the person writing being on the call. I might be incorrect but law doesn't seem to be a discipline where the specific wording is more important than the intent.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com