The question is whether individual video games qualify as quality or "good" art.
Unfortunately, I think the answer is generally a "no". But the potential is certainly there. It's a very new medium.
I won't get into any comparisons of books and games, but I can absolutely say that I have played games that, at the very least, can objectively (or as close to objectivity as you can get when discussing art) be considered good art.
__
Also, I don't really reject the possibility of there being a fact of the matter as to the aesthetic quality of things.
I don't really affirm it either, and if it is true I'd say it is entirely permissible to have aesthetic preferences that go against the true fact of the matter as to aesthetic quality.
And if it turns out that there is no fact of the matter as to aesthetic quality, then arguments that something is of good aesthetic quality could often be transformed into explanations of why that person has those preferences, which still seems like it could be worth knowing.
So, I think it could make sense to not reject all arguments for a thing being of good aesthetic quality