Given that even after his daughter explained the term to him, he still doesn't know that 'The' is part of the phrase, I'm not sure if The Director of the FBI knows what the phrase 'The Man' means...
Given that even after his daughter explained the term to him, he still doesn't know that 'The' is part of the phrase, I'm not sure if The Director of the FBI knows what the phrase 'The Man' means...
"Never let the truth get in the way of a good story."
-- Mark Twain
That reading would also fit into the conversation as a sort of commiseration. "But...you the man dad, who wouldn't want to work with you?"
> The problem is ______.
I suppose it could be made up or embellished, but I don't think it's the most wildly implausible thing ever (unlike @woodman).
Plus they drug test and put your fingerprints into a database.
How are we not funding competitive salaries in this field when it's absolutely crucial to the safety of the nation?
Now if they wanted to be creative they could for example build more offices out in other parts of town, make them more accessible, more moderen, allow a lot more vacation time, say start at 6 weeks, allow sabaticals and so on. But I just don't see FBI going that route.
The same could be asked about soldiers, teachers, and many others. Funding doesn't correlate well at all with to importance to society.
Football coaches are the highest paid employees of very many universities in the U.S., more than Nobel prize winning scientists, world-changing artists and social scientists, and life-saving doctors. Bench-riding professional athletes usually make more than the general commanding all U.S. forces in the Mideast.
http://fortune.com/2015/04/06/fbi-agent-fitness-test/
It's important to note that this means handicapped people are no longer allowed desk jobs as analysts at the FBI. Missing a limb? You can't fight crime anymore!
That's not my primary concern, though, per se. My concern is that firing and disqualifying people who are otherwise talented MUST reduce clearance rates. It's can't NOT do that. If FBI employees looking fit is more important to Mr. Comey[1] than arresting murderers, I have absolutely no interest in his organization.
[1] “I want you to look like the squared-away object of that reverence,” Comey wrote in a memo to agents. “I want the American people to be able to take one glance at you and think, ‘THERE is a special agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.’” http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2015/04/fbi-fitness-test
There are already tons of non-agent IT/Software Engineering/Netsec jobs at the FBI. You can still be a fed, you just don't carry a badge and a gun.
Lots of the people I worked with were in awful shape.
Respect my authority. Bow and be reverent when I question you. Be glad I don't beat you to a bloody pulp right here when nobody is looking.
Comey's statement does seem at least slightly vainglorious. He certainly has a high opinion of how the FBI should be viewed (exceeding, for instance, 'professional' or 'public servant's), and believes it should be obvious who FBI agents are, which will annihilate their undercover operations. So he is sacrificing a lot in order to get big(ger), dumb(er, due to firing and not hiring good investigators) jocks.
But I don't think it is meant to engender obedience or fear in civilians. I think it is just a Bad Decision.
Given Comey's inability to grasp the infeasibility of a mandatory encryption backdoors its a safe bet to say he doesn't.