> on some public and private feedback from speakers who felt uncomfortable attending with him as the keynote speaker.

So you want to say, that there doesn't need to be a real reason anyway, it is just enough that a few other speakers have a problem with him. It doesn't even have to be made transparent what the problems actually is.

And you believe that this kind of closed door denunciation will result in a better, more inclusive world?

And that Crockford doesn't respond to this hypocritical nonsense is a kind of confession of guilt?