Hacker News Reader

Comment by shoo | Hacker News Reader

direct link to full article here (pdf) http://www.ias.org.uk/uploads/pdf/News%20stories/dnutt-lance...

    Drug           Total Harm (to individual + to others)

    Alcohol        72
    Heroin         55
    Crack cocaine  54
    ...
    Tobacco        26
    ...
    Cannabis       20
    ...
    Ecstasy        9
    LSD            7
    Buprenorphine  7
    Mushrooms      6

View on HN

While it's good to question the highly dubious criteria to separate legal from non-legal drugs, I think all these studies showing alcohol as the worst drug fail to account for the fact that if used in a responsible way, the harm caused is practically zero.

A person who likes to drink a cup of wine or a beer two or three times a week, and doesn't do so when driving, receives and causes no harm in practice (I know, there are studies about increasing cancer risks due to alcohol, but no more than with meat and other non-drug products). This is not true of cocaine, heroin or even tobacco, where there is no such thing as a harmless dose, and it is controversial in the case of cannabis.

You do realise that alcohol unlike cannabis or cocaine causes physical dependence?

The author of the paper responded to the harmlessness of alcohol claim: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/mar/07/safe-level-a... — so harmless alcohol use is also controversial.

I've taken a harmless dose of cocaine: I drank coca tea in the Andes. That this is harmless seems less controversial than either alcohol or cannabis.

It's in any case difficult to separate "responsible" and irresponsible use of drugs when deciding on policy. Either alcohol should be banned, or all the less-dangerous drugs should be legalized.

What puzzles me is that alcohol is available OTC and anxiolytics and psychedelics are not. My 2 uncles died in relation to their alcohol abuse. Both of them mostly due to low availability of psychiatric care after their respective divorces (that happened before they started drinking). We have no infrastructure to help people get up after their lives come apart and the only available drug has zero potential to improve their situation.

Our world would be a better place with greater (or universal) access to mental health resources. My hope is that AI will eventually give us this.

Conversely, with LSD, there is no such thing as a harmful dose, so...

Logic and health are not the issue here, entrenchment of economic interests is the point.

> if used in a responsible way, the harm caused is practically zero.

And yet so many people struggle with using alcohol in a responsible way.

Alcohol is, incidentally, the only household-name drug that can actually kill you from withdrawal. Believe it or not, even though heroin withdrawal is miserable, as long as the person is taken care of and kept hydrated, they won't die from it. That is not true of alcohol; a person suffering from acute alcohol withdrawal can literally die from the direct effects of the withdrawal themselves.

In a pinch, opiates can actually be used to help a person detox from alcohol and mitigate the life-threatening seizures (and the pain). Benzos are much better for this, though, and are more commonly used in medical detoxification scenarios.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com