[0] http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/29/cats-wi...
[0] http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/29/cats-wi...
[0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/stop-...
I don't know what to think.
If your average bird-killing building uses less power than about 500 households, the power plant is still coming out ahead.
That alternative forms of power kill wildlife is regular talking point of the entrenched fossil fuel energy giants. As if coal fired power plants and oil fields are wildlife sanctuaries. I'd be interested in who is pulling the strings on this one at the LA Times.
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that while it's unfortunate that this renewable power resource isn't completely benign as we'd like to believe, it must be a slow news day to be writing about the 6,000 birds a year it kills given its size. I imagine if you cordoned off an area of a similar size and threw in a couple of dozen cats in there, even with food and water, you'd chalk up similar numbers.
However then uniqueness of this is the concentrated location of the deaths. Solve it at one place and you prevent thousands.
Cats are everywhere
Kitty isn't killing falcons.
The native species that is closest would be the marsupial "cat" the Tiger Quoll.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_quoll
There was also the Tasmanian Tiger, aka thylacine but they're extinct.
The animals they were domesticated from have been present in much of Africa, Asia and Europe for a couple million years.