33m Married – Seeking city that is not San Francisco
medium.com
medium.com
How about some moderation? There are plenty of places where you pretty much need to drive everywhere, but it's only 1 to 5 miles without much traffic. THAT INCLUDES YOUR COMMUTE. Observe that your current walkability situation is horrible, with a commute that is 45 minutes on a good day. You get to suffer walkability envy, seeing San Francisco every day but actually living a minimum of 45 minutes away.
Example in Florida: Indialantic, Melbourne Beach, Satellite Beach, Melbourne. It's not exactly walkable, but the driving is trivial. I go a mile to work (just 3 minutes), 3 miles to Publix (the nation's 2nd-rated supermarket), a mile to the beach or to freshwater fishing/boating, and so on. Houses are dirt cheap by your standards, sometimes even below 6 figures for what you are seeking. For the prices you are used to facing, you could literally live in a house on the beach.
But I noticed, Chicago, New York, and Toronto are conspicuously absent. These cities, which admittedly don't command a larger-than-average share of devs, and don't enjoy year-long 70-80 F weather, hit most of the points that he's looking for, especially in their extensive suburbs/exurbs.
They have diversity, cultural institutions, jobs (including tech), and their metro areas have locations that are affordable and/or home to rising property values. Do only boomtowns appeal?