Doreen Valiente: The story of the mother of modern witchcraft
independent.co.uk
independent.co.uk
Some comments at the meta level and on a tangent: I still think of that article posted up about René Girard, his influence on Peter Thiel, and the fascinating philosophy of mimetic violence. It's something I want to deep dive into. One of the questions it probes is: why do people create a scapegoat? Why do people want to say things to put down other people?
Fundamentalists scapegoat non-fundamentalists. (Maybe because it is less acceptable now to attack someone for their religious beliefs, so it is easier to attack someone for their lack of religious beliefs). Atheists have responded in kind. I'm not saying this happens here on this specific forum, but I have seen this dynamic happen a lot in other places, both online and offline.
Rational skepticism is one method of inquiry, useful as long as the people involved remain open-minded. Yet, whether we're talking about rational materialists, religious fundamentalists -- or even the drama I got sucked into with that Hong Kong martial arts article -- there is a tendency to rhetorically attack others. It is as if there is a _irrational_ tendency attack ideas (and not in the sense of trying to refine it through oppositional rhetoric, but to dismiss, to destroy, to deny the idea's very existence).
Also, a few wiccans committed a collective suicide in France some time ago.
I guess it's just less mainstream for now. We need to wait a bit for more scandals to emerge.
I've never understood the lofty attitudes of people who engage non-traditional supernatural beliefs. You're just a different idiot.
BS aside, making the world safe for oddballs seems worthwhile so long as they are of mostly harmless varieties.