Facebook fires human editors, algorithm immediately posts fake news
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
The reality is that I am seeing a lot more tabloid-esque topics that seem like they might be relevant but are not once I click through.
Yesterday, a trending topic for me was #mcchicken which I thought oh maybe McDonald's released a new chicken sandwich or some type of food/health news. Instead, it was trending because some guy basically stuck his penis in a mcchicken sandwich and posted a video of it. Previously, I would have expected human editors to either deem this unnewsworthy or at least provide a better one word description than #mcchicken maybe like #guyhassexwithmcchicken.
Anyways, I'm sure it will get better over time but I am missing the old module. I thought the descriptions were succinct and well written.
Facebook explained that the new, non-human Trending module is
personalized "based on a number of factors, including Pages you’ve
liked, your location (e.g., home state sports news), the previous
trending topics with which you’ve interacted, and what is trending
across Facebook overall."
I don't understand how putting their users in an algorithmic echo chamber is a good idea (not to suggest manually curated the trending news was good either). There is already enough distortion of the world caused by whatever flavors of nonsense are popular among a user's set of friends. Why add more? Why add more?
Same reason fast food sells. Exploitation of innate sensory pleasure. "I'm perfectly aligned with my friends and it feels great"Here's the original post: http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2016/08/search-fyi-an-update-to-...
I think some folks need to rethink what is an actual news site, but I expect the continued tweets about it being Facebook doing some payback to conservatives. This stuff is very touchy.
It's not easy to train an algorithm to outperform humans when complex context is required.