How Fuhu went bankrupt
latimes.com
latimes.com
I found it especially ironic when Fuhu later sued Toys R Us for launching a competing tablet in 2012: http://www.zdnet.com/article/why-fuhu-maker-of-the-kids-tabl...
Relevant ironic section:
Mitchell said he decided to go ahead with a lawsuit in part because of what his two young daughters said after they found out about the Tabeo launch.
"They said, 'Dad, they're copying you. Isn't that wrong?' And I said, 'Yes, I do think they are copying me,'" he said. "We just felt we had to take a stand on this."
They like to destroy idiotic companies.
Are there any legal financing options available to manage the fact that cash is needed up front?
The PortableApps website + Community has decent reach after all. :)
Timeline-wise, was their legal dispute with Toys "R" Us over by then? If not, it may have been useful to let Toys "R" Us counsel know... ;)
Wonder if he imagines himself to be Steve Jobs. "Well he woke people up at 4am asking them to change font kerning. Clearly that is the sign of a good leader. I should do that too".
> Technologists at the company didn't get solid answers to why tablets began requiring proprietary cables. Thorough vetting occurred, and Apple’s strategy of proprietary accessories inspired its own, Fuhu said.
Ah yes. Apple did it, so we should do it too. We are just like Apple.
There is another thread on the front page about signs of failed startups -- wanting to be like Steve Jobs and like Apple and just copying superficial behaviors from them is a sign of a failed startup.
For common peripherals .... almost everyone but Apple has to play ball with standards. Even Microsoft, with enough market power, would probably screw it up.
People can be motivated by being part of something greater than themselves, but making a tablet for kids is far too small to fit that billing.
Even if you squint and look at it sideways, you know in you heart of hearts that you are doing something evolutionary, not revolutionary.
You can only act like Steve Jobs if you are actually changing the world, and even then, it's not really a great idea.
Being kind to people, and delivering at a sustainable pace, are a much stronger guarantees of success than randomly waking up underlings at 4am because you wanted a font adjusted.
That sounds a bit confusing. Is "were leaders in" meaning that the company initially had the lead, but then lost it?
https://www.glassdoor.com/Overview/Working-at-Fuhu-EI_IE3609...
2.2 stars overall. 41% CEO approval. Only 23% would recommend to a friend.
Even reptiles should recognize that an unhappy staff adds drastically to turnover, recruiting costs, and organizational turmoil. While reducing the quality, effectiveness, and creativity of the output. And human beings might consider treating staff well just because they're fellow human beings.
So this person took this job and now had to leave US again?
The next trick is to just write all the glassdoor reviews yourself. See, eg, healthtap.
https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/HealthTap-Reviews-E453567....
Wish there was something more that could be done than just saying "I'll never work for or do business with this company and their executives" when I see these clearly fake reviews.
The key takeaway for me is like any business partnership - if the direct stakeholders are all aware of their roles and responsibilities, and have a good grasp of their relative strengths and weaknesses, then it all work well.
However, if there are family members in there who are just along for the free ride or are only interesting in padding their nests or building a mini empire, then it all goes pear shaped and toxic very quickly.
Biggest problem I've seen with family run businesses is the generational change over. The next generation of new blood rarely want to run with the 'old way' and tend to make changes for the sake of change, and do it with little experience of how to recognise/prevent things going off the rails.
I think it's because human beings en masse are extremely reluctant to admit being wrong. Very few are able to say "Oh shit, I am being an asshole and hurting my own company! Gotta change my ways before it's too late!". Almost everyone can say "It's so hard to find good help nowadays, all my employees are whinny entitled douches who demand too much for the little work they do! Gotta toughen up our interview process to get better employees before it's too late!".
At least in my experience, the toughest interviews I had were invariably at the shittiest firms.
I am surprised that the board or other stakeholders didn't see it coming a lot earlier. Nothing more bemusing than a maker of children's devices that doesn't allow 'play' within the company culture. It's like a brewery that expects all its employees to be teetotallers...
That's not an in-house culture problem. That's more of a cash management problem. Were they selling at a loss to build market share?
[1] http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-1208-fuhu-mattel-20151...
That was the story right there.
> Think 9 a.m. to 10 p.m. workdays. Very little vacation. Missed birthday parties and weddings.
This is such a bad idea. I hope this startup idea of unhealthy work-life goes away soon. If you're a founder or have a crushing deadline for a big contract then yes, go ahead and do this. But this should never be the day-to-day pressure of any company.
They are fooling themselves that they are accomplishing more this way. A good way to lose your best talent or the abilities of the talented who stay.
[1] http://www.inc.com/magazine/201409/lindsay-blakely/inc.500-2...
1. I’ve worked in customer service jobs before and I’ve generally found that they can be an extremely tiring job as well as one that is difficult to hire for. The pay tends to suck, especially if you’re trying to survive on those wages in LA, and you get many employees who don’t take the job particularly seriously leading to lots of turnover. My friend was extremely excited to join Fuhu and I was happy to learn that many of her coworkers in support were equally excited to be there, initially at least. They all seemed very eager to be a part of a growing tech company and in the case of my friend, spent countless hours on Facebook during her off hours answering customer inquires. Her initial enthusiasm turned to dread in a matter of weeks due to what she described as a hostile work environment where those who weren’t a part of the inner circle of managers were treated with disdain. Now again, I’ve worked in low level customer service before, and while the pay was indeed low, the owner of the small business I worked at always treated me with respect. I feel you can judge an organization fairly accurately by how it treats its lowest paid employees.
2. She told me on multiple occasions that she felt uncomfortable because of what she perceived were different standards that were applied to non-Asian employees by the predominantly Asian managers. Normally, I like to tread carefully on such topics unless I have first hand knowledge, but being that I’ve always valued her opinion, plus the fact that she herself is Asian, I took her word for it.
3. Some of you may remember that on Sept 21, 2012, the Space Shuttle Endeavour, riding atop the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft, made its last landing at LAX on way to its permanent display at the California Science Center. Fuhu was at the time headquartered in the top floors of a low-mid rise building directly across from LAX. They had just completed a new top floor office with gorgeous views to the north including LAX and up to the Santa Monica mountains, but most employees were still in an older office one or two floors below facing away from the airport. A few hours after Endeavour’s arrival I text my friend to see how she enjoyed the landing. Apparently, no one had bothered to tell her and her lowly coworkers in the lower office of the landing despite the fact that the managers and higher level staff all gathered around the large windows to watch. Now I realize that I’m a space buff so my view on this is obviously biased, but I found that to be a fairly petty. On it's own it might not seem like a big deal but from her retelling, it seemed to be a part of a broader culture that really wasn't inclusive or respectful of the lower level employees.
While I feel bad that she missed the landing, it did lead to me developing a simple basis for evaluating upper management. We can call it Inconel’s Rule of Management Excellence. There’s only one rule:
If there happens to be a once in a lifetime Shuttle Carrier Aircraft landing happening in your city, garnering mainstream press and causing people from all over the city, even those without any connection to the aerospace industry, to line up by the thousands alongside roadways, on freeway overpasses and gather on top of roofs, for the chance at a quick glimpse as the Shuttle goes by, and you happen to work in a building that offers probably the single best view of the LAX runways and the Shuttle landing, and management, despite taking in this once in a lifetime sight themselves, doesn’t bother informing their underlings to take a quick 5-10 minute break to also enjoy this sight, well, I think it's fair to assume that management is made up of assholes.
There it is, that’s my rule.