Extreme Commuting (2005)
businessweek.com
businessweek.com
Extreme commuters are the fastest growing group of work commuters in the country, who rarely see their homes in the daylight. People who spend a month of their lives each year commuting at least an hour and a half to work and back each day are considered extreme commuters. This is compared with the US average of 50 minutes and according to the Census Bureau their numbers have jumped 95% since 1990 to 3.4 million workers. Experts say their numbers will continue to grow.
In 1990 24% of workers left their home counties on their way to the office, and since then 50% of all new workers are doing the same. Many extreme commuters are forced to drive the long distances because the affordable housing isn’t near the good paying jobs.
Interestingly, economists say this “commuting paradox” doesn’t pay off in terms of life satisfaction. A commuter who travels one hour each way would have to make 40% more in pay to be as satisfied with his life if he were a non-commuter.
Later on, he took a pretty big pay cut to get out of his industry altogether (automotive service) to take a job in-town, with a 5-minute commute, doing something he loved (food). Quality of life is important. He still made enough to support our family, and he was around more and much happier. Being able to bike to your dad's work and have lunch with him on the weekend is more important than a bigger house and some spare spending money.
I can't imagine myself spending 3 hours a day in the car. I'd die of boredom and frustration (not to mention feel guilty about burning all that fuel just so I can work).
A friend of mine actually moved about 45 minutes away to be closer to his job... and then his job moved, and he's got an hour and a half commute, each way.
I'd pay the fee to break the lease in that case. I cannot imagine spending that much time commuting.
I do it because what baffles me is how people can live in a city. I grew up in SF, and moved out ever since college. The thought of living in the city horrifies me. The people, the crowdedness, the lack of open space, etc...
I sooner quit my job and take a pay cut than move back to SF.
Personally I enjoy my 4 hour commute, 2 of which I spend on the ferry taking a nap or working, and I prefer it over living in the city.
Not a lot of people understands or agrees with me, but that's fine.
After three months I started telecommuting two days per week and try to work in an extra day here and there.
I love my job and where I work. There's nowhere close to me that offers the same opportunity. I just wish it were closer.
Moving is not a easy option because I have a family to consider. I also don't want to live near my job because I don't care for the town - in fact, there is no town, just corporate parks and plazas.
I live where I do because it's affordable. I don't own a McMansion.
It's not a perfect situation but, you work with what you have. I'm working toward pushing the telecommuting option further.
The irony is that I have to be more productive telecommuting than if I warmed a seat for eight hours :-)
Plus, the entire time I can be listening to music or podcasts, and on the train I can be catching up on Twitter or stuff in Instapaper. I'd be spending that time doing it anyway.
But I can tell you this -- I'm the only 22-year-old on that train.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/22/michael-hanley-gm-a...