A Warning: Facebook dating apps see massive user drop after FB policy change.
plentyoffish.wordpress.com
plentyoffish.wordpress.com
As long as you provide a service people actually want, I think you'll be safe regardless of what changes Facebook makes to its policies.
This is why you don’t build companies that are completely dependent on spam.
Facebook is also partnering with Zynga for some dating thing. So the lesson here is that you don't want to build on a platform that isn't making money and can only make money by competing directly with platform adopters.
Or: Don't be a dick to your users. Make something of value and send messages when you have real content.
An app I have't used in ages emailed me yesterday trying to sell me calling cards (this is not in any way related to the app at all).
Reported to facebook, hopefully that hole will be closed soon also.
Making it harder for apps to spam users, will actually benefit the fb platform as a whole. I actually think they're mostly doing a good job, given most project sponsor's initial thoughts around gaining users are to try and spam all existing users as much as possible, and then try and import all their contacts. There was quite a bit of this in the early fb days, but not so much now. This is a good thing.
Now, how to write an effective dating app? How to get women using a dating app. These are the real challenges. P.o.F. is an ok site that I've used in the past, but always felt it could be better. Though I guess if you've got a steady income stream, you're more worried about breaking it, and loosing an income, than innovating. Have you thought of doing a sister site or two?
While I agree, what makes you say that? I think the biggest draw is that it's free - there's no incentive to not try it if you're trying to find love online. Is it actually better than Match, Chemistry, and whatever else I ignore during commercial breaks?
It definitely has a Web 2.0 feel that, IMHO, attracts the more intelligent demographic; people with the the ability to be introspective.
I haven't used any other sites, though. But I imagine OKCupid is not a representative sample of the population, and That Is A Good Thing.
Structure it to favour women, i.e. woman can see the man by default, but the woman has to allow the man to see her. Then for men, you just have to let them know when they're 'live' (that is on camera) and give them something to do while they wait for a woman to say "ok, this guy can see me".
"This is why you don’t build companies that are completely dependent on the whim of another company."
Of course, an advertising supported dating site who's revenue comes primarily from Adsense doesn't come under this sweeping generalisation does it...
plentyoffish can change advertising networks, these people cant change social networks if they want to be where people are.