Sponge creates steam using ambient sunlight
news.mit.edu
news.mit.edu
Love it when discoveries are made by accident.
That part of the piece seemed like something the MIT press office coaxed out of them to get a human interest angle TBH.
Really, most of their improvement over the 2014 version seems to come from the spectrally-selective absorber coating, which is a lot more expensive than bubble wrap. So they say this solution might be ~10x cheaper than existing solar destilling plants, but they also say it will need replacement ~10x as often. So depending on exactly how the numbers work out, this might mean slightly cheaper, more labor-intensive desalinisation plants, but we're not covering any deserts just yet.
Even if they're a little confused about turning energy into matter, it does make me wonder if it's possible to manufacture something cheap, flexible, and durable enough that you could carry a "solar still" blanket for survival purposes. Just unroll it over some moist sand or vegetation, and it would distill and collect water that you could then drink out of a little tube.
Space has the opposite problem: Remember that vacuum is a perfect insulator. The problem is usually about being able to dump excess heat.
Original link: www.nature.com/articles/ncomms5449
From the article it sounded like this was an idea that was being considered.
It's not surprising that one could get such a result from solar thermal. Heat pipe based solar collectors have been doing this in cloudy English environs for many years. The really impressive part of this solution is its potential extremely low cost.
Humor is okay, but should at most be supplementing a more thoughtful comment, and not be the primary contribution of a comment.
Really, the simplest thing to do is make sure you contribute to discussion in some small way, and then put a rider on for the less contributive aspects you want to voice. That's what the above is really espousing, and while it's not a rule, it does seem to make the discussion flow smoother (and prevents people from jumping in about how you aren't contributing...)
Specifically: The most important principle on HN, though, is to make thoughtful comments. Thoughtful in both senses: civil and substantial.
The test for substance is a lot like it is for links. Does your comment teach us anything? There are two ways to do that: by pointing out some consideration that hadn't previously been mentioned, and by giving more information about the topic, perhaps from personal experience. Whereas comments like "LOL!" or worse still, "That's retarded!" teach us nothing.