Good article, but ugh, please leave Shakespeare alone if (as you freely admit) you don't know anything about Shakespeare. Just because the real thing sounds strange to you doesn't mean that your "samples" are anything but nonsense.

edit To (preemptively) stress that I am not trolling: I find the topic and the writeup interesting and useful, and I appreciate the work that people do to share their experiences. But this is not a good example of the RNN working; it's a good example of the RNN not working, and should either be omitted or presented at least neutrally, instead of glibly saying

> I can barely recognize these samples from actual Shakespeare :)