While your post is definitely readable, the errors in it clearly show you as a non-fluent/native speaker. This may suggest to some that communicating with you could be difficult, and make you less likely to be recruited and add to HR preventing things from moving forward.
Perhaps with your free time you could work on mastering the language? It seems like you're 90% of the way there, you just need to work on the little details now. It would probably be a good investment on your part.
Some examples to help show you what I mean:
- "Every company anew want" - no one uses the word "anew'. This should read "Every new company wants", but you'd really be fine with "Every company wants"
- "And recruiter didn't helped" - could go a few different ways, but I'd suggest "And recruiters hadn't helped"
How is the company supposed to know if you're a good fit for the position without an interview process? Blind faith?
As for "not wanting to prove yourself", you get to a point in your professional life where it's easy to feel like you've proven yourself a thousand times over with previous employment, solid references, a glowing resume, interviews with headhunters etc. and it can be frustrating when you walk in the door anew and despite 25 years of proving yourself, you once again have to redo that work. In an industry where we spend our entire lives automating away repetitive tasks, this is the one repetitive task that we just don't appear to be able to automate away... but if you don't want to go in the front door with all the other candidates, the only other way is to make a name for yourself that spans the industry:
- Attend user groups
- Attend conferences
- Network with key people at those conferences
- Become a speaker at conferences
- Put up courses on Coursera, PluralSight and other big name training sites
This way your name is out there, you're essentially being pre-vetted by the personnel that matter within these companies and you're already well known before you walk in the door. In essence, you're proactively interviewing.
When you speak at a conference, you're effectively interviewing at every company who has staff in the room. When you run a course, you're doing the same.
And this is where having savings and access to other assets is crucial. Otherwise this lead time will force you to take the first position that pays, rather than the position that is best.
> ... but if you don't want to go in the front door with all the other candidates, the only other way is to make a name for yourself that spans the industry
I'd add:
- write a blog
- write an e-book
- give first, whether that is by networking, volunteering, or doing an open source project.
All of this is high on the effort scale, but it's an investment that I've seen pay off.
There are lower effort tasks you can do, including things like always be networking and sending interesting articles to friends and acquaintances. In fact, when I'm interviewing for a contract, if it doesn't work out for me, I'll often send a note to some former colleagues seeing if any of them are interested. If they are, it's a win-win for the job seeker and the employer at low cost to me.
When I hear of people that can't get and job and are in IT, they're either:
1) Inexperienced and don't have the the charisma and confidence to prove they can learn things quickly. I feel sorry for these people and I hope they can learn the skills to help themselves.
2) Think they know their stuff but they're book learned, probably have some bits of paper that say they're certified in X or Y that no one cares about, I see so many people with rubbish qualifications like MCSE or CCNA etc... (note that CCNA does teach you important networking concepts but that's not its point), these people piss me off, and when they do get a job - they're the ones I don't want to have anything to do with.
(Could an all-around virtuoso, or someone who had practiced that particular useless but impressive skill, do it reasonably well? Sure. But that's not the point).
Programming is this way. But it doesn't have to be. There's education, professional licensing, portfolio, accomplishments, references, reputation, with an hour or two of interviews at the end to discuss these things in more detail and assess culture fit. Maybe a demonstration of relevant skills under realistic conditions. Not blind faith, but some trust that respectable peer institutions don't graduate or promote/retain horrifically incompetent people very often. The way professionals get hired past entry level in any other line of work.
(At entry level, internships are readily available to those without much of a track record yet, and you prove yourself from there).