Turn Off Cortana Completely in Windows 10 Anniversary Update
zdnet.com
zdnet.com
I don't truly understand the goal of Cortana, other than "Apple has Siri". Some of the person assistant features seems handy, but do you really need to talk to your computer? The only place where it seems like something I'd need is when cooking and want to look up a recipe.
Microsoft efforts would have been better spend improving the built in search.
I find it very useful and would most definitely turn it on. It will also become a lot better in the future when software is integrated with it (office coming in the next update).
The "spying" has been greatly exaggerated, I think, by people who suddenly found themselves without a reason to hate on Microsoft and it was the obvious choice.
So what? Why should I be worried and/or scared? For reference, I am not a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant, and actually come from a group that tends to be (in my opinion) unfairly painted in people's minds.
I kind of like the idea of Microsoft having access to all of my data. Maybe one day in the future, people will be like..."hmm...you know that random group X that we generalized in order to hate on? turns out we can't really generalize them so easily -- we even have data to back it up!"
I'd be like a primary source in future archaeology!
A service, a product, a bribe. Something of tangible value.
If my data is being taken and I'm not interested in the service being provided in return, I feel like I'm being ripped off.
As for the part in their Privacy Statement (https://privacy.microsoft.com/en-us/privacystatement/), which boils down to that, it's this section:
"Finally, we will access, transfer, disclose, and preserve personal data, including your content (such as the content of your emails in Outlook.com, or files in private folders on OneDrive), when we have a good faith belief that doing so is necessary to:
1. comply with applicable law or respond to valid legal process, including from law enforcement or other government agencies;
2. protect our customers, for example to prevent spam or attempts to defraud users of our products, or to help prevent the loss of life or serious injury of anyone;
3. operate and maintain the security of our products, including to prevent or stop an attack on our computer systems or networks; or
4. protect the rights or property of Microsoft, including enforcing the terms governing the use of the services - however, if we receive information indicating that someone is using our services to traffic in stolen intellectual or physical property of Microsoft, we will not inspect a customer's private content ourselves, but we may refer the matter to law enforcement."
"Access, transfer, disclose, and preserve" is what I summarized as "complete access", as that is everything you can do with data, except maybe destroy it, but that doesn't make much sense in a privacy-context.
And then "when we have a good faith belief that doing so is necessary", that's the part where you sign away the rights for Microsoft to do that whenever the fuck they want.
I mean, they list a few points, for what it would be necessary, so you might be able to make a case in court, that Microsoft could never have had that good faith belief for one of those points, but then one of those points is "protect the [...] property of Microsoft". And without a doubt would Microsoft have a good faith belief that selling your personal data is necessary to protect their property.
A few days ago, however, I had to set a five minutes timer. It was much easier to press the Windows key and type "set a timer for five minutes" than to go search for whatever app is responsible for timers. I find the "grandma-friendly command line" part of Cortana much more useful than the voice control part, and I can see why it comes enabled by default. I mainly use Linux and wish I had something like that in my KDE desktop (the Alt+F2 command bar is similar, but nowhere close).
DuckDuckGo's implementation [0] seems more robust to me, but if you don't use it as your default search engine, it's probably easier anyways to just click on the first link in the Google search results (or use Cortana obviously).
And yeah, you do need to leave the tab open until it ends. I don't see that as that big of a flaw as you do, since most people have a browser open all the time anyways, but yeah, whatever floats your boat. Certainly isn't terrible to have another option for it.
Now, at home, when logged in chrome with my google account, I get... search results for the term "stopwatch".
When I search for "stopwatch" in an incognito window, I get the "google search app", like so (just as I get at work): http://imgur.com/a/9r7Z2
So, some people following your "lmgtfy" link might just get... search results for a "5 minute timer".
When logged in, url-bar search redirects to https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome-psyapi2&ion=1&... (yields just the search terms, for me..)
When anonymous, url-bar search redirecty to https://www.google.com/search?q=stopwatch&oq=stopwatch&aqs=c... (yields the stopwatch)
And google has Google Now. Amazon has Alexa. I think if you want to be competitive in the OS world, you'll probably need something like this. The real problem is how heavy handed MS is with pushing its features.
>but do you really need to talk to your computer?
On mobile, yes, considering Win10 is also a mobileOS. In desktop mode you would just type in the cortana box if you prefer.
I also imagine there's a larger vision for Cortana. The product is pretty half-assed right now but I could see it being used for a lot of admin functions we're used to via control panel or hotkeys. It would be nice to say, "Cortana switch the display to the wireless projector" or "Cortana, update the nvidia driver."
Remember that scene when Scotty scoffs at the 20th century computer you couldn't talk to in The Voyage Home? Of course we want to talk to our computers. I want to order it around, not hunt and peck through menus and control panels or try to find something with endless swipes. People like to talk and give orders. As technology becomes more featureful, we'll be using a voice a lot more. I know I do already with Google Now on my watch and Alexa at home.
On mobile, still no, because none of them actually work properly. And didn't the mobile division recently shut down?
> I also imagine there's a larger vision for Cortana. The product is pretty half-assed right now but I could see it being used for a lot of admin functions we're used to via control panel or hotkeys. It would be nice to say, "Cortana switch the display to the wireless projector"
In exchange for losing the discoverability that projectors are indeed supported. It'll also be wonderful to have to Google for exactly how to word it so that Cortana will actually parse it correctly.
> or "Cortana, update the nvidia driver."
At this point I wouldn't be surprised if the next update completely removes the ability to do this...
Google Assistant, Alexa, and Siri are all on by default.
Cortana can be disabled with renaming an .exe in AppData folder.
The difference between them is that Microsoft uses an Dark-Pattern to obscure the "Not now" option by placing it off to the left in normal font styling where as the "Next" button is a proper button.
I'm not sure if Google and Amazon are this bad. MS really is buying deep into dark pattern warfare against its users. I think its valid to complain about it.
I have not experienced any nagging to activate Cortana on any of the 7 devices I have it installed on. I disabled Cortana during the setup screen on each and that was the end of it.
Now a recent update added the Search button back on tablets that you can't get rid of, which is annoying, but Cortana still isn't enabled. If you click on the button it's just the bog standard Windows Search. Someone mentioned this was part of the Anniversary update but neither of my tablets have enough drive space to perform the Anniversay update but I still have the search button in the task bar. Either way it's lame.
This. We still don't have a half decent, open source desktop AI assistant - The only kind that I would trust to access my personal data - GNU/Linux (Ubuntu?) has to catch up a little bit here.
Yes, and we've been waiting decades for it.
And we've been waiting for Minority Report for a decade and a half too.
The future is late.
Btw, please skip the part where you try to explain why no one needs it. You simply lack imagination.
Now? "Ok Google...set timer for 30 mins." Much quicker than unlocking, finding the Clock app, and fat-fingering the time widgets. This also works for reminders and a host of other things.
Speech recognition is not a gimmick.
"Children! 10 more minutes, then we're turning screens off. Hey Siri! Set a timer for ten minutes."
Much easier than fiddling with the crown to set a 10 minute timer.
Of course coders have made progress at using dictation:
http://ergoemacs.org/emacs/using_voice_to_code.html
Like I said, you lack imagination. Also, no one said you need to use speech for every task. It might simply help with RSI so you don't end up like this:
Also, most people aren't coders. Designers, for example, might be using Photoshop with a Wacom tablet and would like to not have to use a keyboard. "New layer" "Layer hide" " "move layer up/down". "Text tool. Change text to San Francisco regular 16 point "
Yes it is a stupid default, no it is not sending screenshots back to Microsoft.
Edit: Also in the general tab, disable "share clips and screenshots by default". That's not as bad as automatically taking screenshots, but it's still awful.
Get-AppxPackage xboxapp | Remove-AppxPackage
Yet App history shows a cpu usage of 0:07:25 and network transfer of 1.5MB for Cortana.
http://www.laptopmag.com/articles/disable-lock-screen-window...
No cortana (warning: no start menu searching either), no modern apps (you can intergrate calc.exe), no store, defender, remove alot of telemetry, one drive, etc.
There are issues such as no more start menu search because of removing cortana. It's all about what you personally need.
Thanks, but it's just a throwaway user name I won't use after this post.
At some point you have to trust something, whether it be your software or your hardware.
Besides the telemetry stuff, it's not a trust issue. I just don't have a need for any of the packages I remove. I don't need cortana and search, I don't need Windows Defender and it's cloud features, I don't need onedrive, xbox, modern apps, etc. It's my choice, so I remove them.
These kinds of toolkits have existed since Windows 7 at least (NLite and friends). Some are the equivalent of putting go-faster stripes on your car, some actually work, some do things like https://twitter.com/SwiftOnSecurity/status/75879678600154726...
Perhaps the level of run-this-binary trust is about the same for both sources, but he trusts the motivation of the random-forumer more than those of Microsoft?
2 its open source, as in you open bat file and read its source
So all in all, Microsoft seems to be on the right track regarding privacy. It is not moving very fast but at least it is moving to the right direction.
Had there been another voice activated software to do searches on the internet, like Samada, people would have utilized it better.
That's the one thing I wanted from Windows 10. But no. They gave me this useless Cortana bullshit that can only search with Bing.
Windows10ReTweaker http://win10epicfail.proboards.com/thread/100/interested-par...