From 2013, for those who remember it the first time it went around and thought this might be a new finding.
Thanks for that. I didn't see the previous posting, but it seemed important.
It was important. It's became part of the argument against austerity. The continued support for it, despite poor evidence that it's useful, has convinced me that austerity exists for something other than promoting the public good.
(That's not the only evidence which lead to my conclusion.)