https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Arab_Mind
I will nevertheless read it.
[0] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/may/24/worlddispatch....
Funny thing - given how easy it is to get an "racist" label these days, I'd treat this as a signal that the book may be touching on some controversial topics or reaching unpopular conclusions.
"Race" does not explain anything - although, many people would love it to because that would make it easier to comprehend the world. There is very dark history of this in european pseudoscience. There is far more genetic variation in average within population groups of same 'race' as there are between 'races'.
There are cultures with obviously harmful practices - take female circumsision for example - but to the way to respond to those is to make it clear it is not acceptable, and not to use it as an example of the barbarism of individuals belonging to the culture in question.
There are wide variations in cultural sensibilities, and actual painpoints between interactions of populations. There are well known, and actually difficult problems to solve. Adding crackpot theories to the mix based on opinion and imagination does not really help the world to evolve.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orientalism_(book)#Criticism
Real life is far more complex than your average geopolitical wannabe-strategist gives the slightest credit for.
See: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/wiki/books/middleeast...
For some more resources