The Miracle of the Modern Banana
nationalgeographic.com
nationalgeographic.com
Now, I live in East Java, Indonesia, and I eat the bananas right outside, which are a plantain. I am amazed out how quickly the plant regrows and produces fruit. I never knew they were a berry.
Indonesian bananas just gained tariff-free import to Japan last year to compete with the likes of Dole, Chiquita, and others. Fortunately, Indonesia has many varieties still being grown in case the TR-4 fungus hits harder than it already has. The Philippines has lost many plantations.
I personally prefer the smaller, less popular banana here for its taste. Maybe all those years of eating Cavendish bananas wore out my taste buds.
I do think the GMO crowd will step in, since obviously they can't wait to hybridize a local banana to scale up production to meet demand.
Most people do.
The cavendish is not popular because it's good[0], it's popular because it's export-resilient: it supports green-picking and ethylene-ripening well, it handles limited refrigeration (13.5~15C) for long periods of time, it has good shelf life after artificial ripening and it looks pretty good all along (as far as western consumers are concerned anyway). A cavendish might see to two months between picking and consumption.
[0] most people I know of who have eaten other cultivars find cavendish bland and uninteresting, one of my colleagues compared it to an oatmeal sausage
In a stroke of PR genius The United Fruit then appropriated a mascot - The Señorita Chiquita Banana based on Carmen Miranda's "The Lady in the Tutti Frutti Hat", from the Hollywood movie "The Gangs All here." Youtube it if you want some entertainment. This largely put an innocuous public image on their immoral business practices.
"The Banana Company" in Gabriel Garcia's "Hundred Years of Solitude" is also an allusion to the United Fruit Company.
I can recommend this read on the subject: https://www.amazon.com/Bananas-United-Fruit-Company-Shaped/d...
"In June of 1954, U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower approved a coup, led by the Central Intelligence Agency, to drive Árbenz out of power. It was subtle and designed to be secret: Almost $3 million was allotted for the operation, and the largest expenditure was for "psychological warfare and political action” designed to limit detection of American fingerprints. CIA director Allen Dulles wrote in a memo to President Eisenhower that, “The entire effort is…more dependent upon psychological impact rather than actual military strength.”
The gambit worked, and when the coup ended, the CIA installed a new president sympathetic to American interests. Árbenz was taken to the airport, stripped to his underwear, paraded before cameras, and exiled to Mexico. The fight with the United States that had cost him his dignity was over taxes, land, and wages. But at its core, it was about bananas.
Árbenz spent the next few decades wandering around Mexico, Switzerland and France. Meanwhile, Guatemala, stripped of its leader, its dignity, and its national ambition, descended into civil war. The conflict lasted 36 years."
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/people-and-culture/food/th...
And in Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1954_Guatemalan_coup_d%27%C3%A...
Nobody said a banana company overthrew a government but rather they colluded with folks who could. And it was an obvious choice a they were hugely influential and well connected as the country's largest employer. They also controlled some of the only infrastructure in the country in the form of railways.
The CIA was involved because because it had a vested interest in keeping leftist governments out of the Americas. The CIAs involvement as well as the US interventionist policies in Central America are fact. They are both well very well known and documented. They also largely continued right up through the 1980s(See the Sandinistas, The Iran Contra Affair.) Hello?
Here is a nice time line outlining different affairs:
https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/us-interventions-in-lati...
and the the Guatemalan incident being referred to above is documented on the CIAs own website:
https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intellig...
Your own comment is largely nonsense of course.
As a guess, it doesn't transport as well as Cavendish: ripens too quickly, gets brown spots too easily.
Of note, many have forgotten, but rice suffered from a pandemic blight in the 1980s that was saved only because a particular species of wild rice, coincidentally found in South India, happened to have disease resistant genes.
Do you have a source for this part?
Do you have a source for this as well please?
https://books.google.com.my/books?id=dlvNBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA287&l...
Dude goes to some pretty stuffy parties.
For real though this is interesting. Seems logical that as a food we grow consolidates it becomes easier for one biological agent to wipe it out.
[1] https://www.damninteresting.com/the-unfortunate-sex-life-of-...
I recall eating the best bananas I've ever had when I was in the Dominican Republic. They were a little short and thicker, but much denser and more moist (made the US Cavendish seem dry and lightweight in comparison) with a great flavor. I don't know what variety they would have been.
I'm curious as to why more varieties are not available globally. I guess I'll have to wait for the next part.
Some of the other such as plantains aren't very edible raw which is why you seem them flambéd in deserts and fried into chips.
Interesting that you bring up Vietnam because it looking increasingly like they are looking to be the largest banana supplier to Asia, soon to overtake the Philippines. There was a big splash in Japan last year when Vietnamese bananas showed up in Don Quijote a discount chain in Japan.