A public company like Walmart, there's some people doing
some math here.
http://www.zdnet.com/article/yahoo-reports-another-big-loss-... Yahoo also reported that it's writing down $482 million
in charges related to the declining value of Tumblr,
the social-blogging service that Yahoo acquired for
$1.1 billion in 2013.
http://www.theverge.com/2015/7/8/8910999/microsoft-job-cuts-... and the company is writing off $7.6 billion related to
its acquisition of the Nokia phone business. That's more
than the $7.2 billion Microsoft paid for Nokia's phone
business last year.
Public companies "do some math", but that doesn't mean their math is always right. Acquisitions are bets, and bets don't always pay off.1) A calculation of risk/reward on this investment
2) Determining whether result of 1 appropriately reflects Walmart's risk profile.
Given that Walmart decided to acquire, it is safe to assume this investment's risk of loss falls within Walmart's investment profile.
Translation: "I can't see how this deal makes sense but WalMart is a huge company so it has to make sense even if to me it doesn't".
By that logic no big company would ever fail or screw up. Every time there's a huge acquisition there are some people here making this fallacious argument or a variation of it. There are always people "doing some math" inside these companies, that doesn't mean that the success of any given strategy is a given.
The equation they're solving for is probably not, "How can we maximize Walmart's profits?", though. It's "How can I maximize my own immediate career goals?"