Kids can now learn to code with Pocky, the delicious Japanese snack
theverge.com
theverge.com
The focus on problem solving may be good for helping kids learn and practice solving problems procedurally. The free form nature of scratch gives a lot of freedom for goofing off, which can be a good thing.
Scratch is great and noble and better in every way as an isolated programming learning tool, but it's worth noting the reach and marketability of Pocky to get kids interested in the whole scene.
You (parents, kids, non-CS-oriented teachers and mentors) aren't going to find and use Scratch without the prime directive of "I want a kid-friendly programming learning tool".
But now you can get the kids Pocky, which you may have gotten anyway since no kid is going to complain about that, and they can learn something meaningful and cool with a character that has context they know and appreciate, unlike scratch's characters that exist in their bubble. Actually being able to impact a much larger audience even with a less ideal experience, is net worth much more than a stellar tool that cannot break past a high activation barrier and caters to a very tiny audience. Like Settlers of Catan for introducing people to board games outside Monopoly, and IFLS (I Fucking Love Science) for getting people interested in space, biology, etc. These seem like perverted contractions of beautiful things, but at the end of the day they get more people interested and that's a good thing.
I for one remember countless mornings reading and learning the backs of the cereal boxes as I had breakfast getting ready for school, and those mornings would have been so much more productive building Pocky programs, but there was no way I was going to fire up Scratch and create programs there.
Maybe we'll get Calorie Mate food blocks next. Programming with Calorie Mate could become a thing.
The "lay out a pattern with physical objects, take a picture, analyze, and build program" approach is interesting. Like most forms of visual programming, it won't scale, but it's cute.
Now someone into Minecraft should build something where you build with Legos, take a picture, and import into Minecraft.
I'm going to anal-retentively nitpick you and proclaim that Pocky was available in places like Yaohan (now defunct) [1] before Nijiya [2] even existed. ;)
[1] First US store in 1979 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaohan
[2] First store in 1986 http://www.nijiya.com/about-us
I am going to look for one of these packs though :-)
Pocky is great.
This sounds pretty cool though.
I'm not downvoting you, but it seems this comes off as a sweeping generalization without any support. If you could at least back up your point with some basis for your statement (ie a reference to something), it would probably help to clarify what you're talking about.
Reminds me of Calvin eating boxes and boxes of "Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs" to get the flying beanie: https://chrisstich.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/ca4.gif
As far as I recall, children can learn "Computational Thinking" without having to concentrate on the often heavy syntax of programming.
I agree with you that setting up candy on a table, to take a photo of it and then getting some game-character to move accordingly, sounds a bit far fetched and might not give enough to actually learn programming. But it could definitely work to some extent, and if nothing else it sounds like a great markething scheme.
Hours spent coding should be followed or broken up by physical activity, not sugary treats.
That would be a lot healthier than a high fructose visual programming language like Pocky.
Yeah, we should force kids to go run laps around the block every time they complete a few dozen lines, or master a new concept. That'll motivate them to learn!
> Hours spent coding should be (...) broken up by physical activity
Please don't. It's hard enough to find two or three hours of uninterrupted time as an adult. Kids and teenagers can pull off impressive feats of quick learning and skill acquisition in big part because they have long stretches of uninterrupted time. Don't take away the opportunity they have.
That said, I'm not saying one should not have a healthy lifestyle. Sure, encourage more physical activity. But for the love of Great Maker, do not break up the time kids spend on intellectual tasks or hobbies into small chunks. You can do fitness rituals in 15-minutes stretches, but you can't do anything that requires any kind of creativity or focus in that time.
I do my programming in chunk of twenty minutes at a time.
Complete focus, no distraction.
If you can just sit down at random times and immediately code for 20 minutes with full focus, please tell us your secret. It sounds like a superhuman skill.
Good breaks:
- I walk around the building
- Watch a short comedy youtube video
- Scroll through memes/comics
- Read blog posts, usually ones that aren't too detail-oriented and with good stopping points (Coding Horror is a good example)
- Listen to an instrumental music song (no lyrics), close my eyes, maybe get some fresh air.
Bad breaks:
- Start a long email
- Other projects.
- Anything mentally taxing or stressful (don't pay bills on break, don't try to figure out what you'll have for dinner)
- Read an exciting book that you don't want to put down
Doing this helps me stay focused all day. Over an 8 hour shift I take breaks for approx 48-80 minutes (plus lunch), so at most a little over an hour is wasted--versus burning out after just a few hours, writing bad code that I then spend the next day cleaning up.
This further translates into me being able to work some more on some side projects when I get home without getting burnt out--and not always programming, but other mental work like writing, art, meal planning, etc.
Your selfish act of keeping your own body healthy with literally dozens of minutes of pointless kilocalorie-burning and wasted watts every week is a Nash equilibrium choice. Think of all the benefits to society that could be realized if no one ever needed to exercise to stay healthy. But if you're healthy now, you have no particular incentive to cheat death. You're taking brains out of that innovation lottery.
Come on, people. We can automate people out of their paying jobs, but can't automate exercise out of existence?!
Perhaps there is a sort of cognitive dissonance in play. People who have remained healthy their entire lives by disciplined application of exercise would undoubtedly feel betrayed and devalued when people can achieve the same results with drugs and implants.
/s
Programming and doing exercise are not entirely rivalrous tasks, but I can get a lot done in 3 hours if I am completely focused and entirely uninterrupted (even from self-sourced interruptions).
They could base it on PostScript, so it had nice graphics.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=s3gIrqQhwkM
And yes I know someone is going to complain it's not English. So what. Neither is the pronounciation of pizza. If you can bother to say pee-tsa instead of piz-ah you can bother to say poe-key instead of paw-key
Do you correctly pronounce "champagne" the French way around your English-speaking friends, even though the French pronunciation sounds almost nothing like "sham pain" so of course you have to explain yourself every single time you say the word?
Does actual phlegm emerge from your throat whenever you correctly pronounce the Greek letter chi at the end of TeX and LaTeX, or do you just say "lay tech" or (god forbid) "lay techs"?
Most importantly, do you say "guh noo slash lin ucks" and go around correcting everyone who doesn't? Because if you do any of these things, please, please, please stop. Please. Please. Seriously, it is so not worth it.
I thought it was "lah tech."
Example: Recently visited France. Learned "framboise" ends with 'z' where as lots of English speaking people some how think the correct French pronunciation is fram-buwa. It's not it's fram-buawz
http://forvo.com/word/framboise/
If someone says Bay-Nay-Nay for Banana or Hey-Ker Neh-wass for Hacker News I'd expect people would correct them. There's a reason we correct people's pronunciations. If we didn't they'd eventually stop being able to communicate. You might have been able to excuse it when it was harder to communicate world wide. now you can talk to at least 1/2 the world from your pocket. No more excuses.