The brain's reward circuitry regulates immunity
nature.com
nature.com
I was going to see if it could be torn apart but
1) Shen-Orr is a very thorough, un-full-of-shit researcher,
2) I like how they used CyTOF in a novel capacity here, and
3) depressed people do tend to get sick more often.
That said, some of the largest divergences between mice and primates are in the brain, so it would be wise to exercise caution when generalizing these findings to humans.
If you need the full paper and have misplaced your subscription credentials, I hope you would not resort to plugging the DOI into http://sci-hub.bz like so:
http://sci-hub.bz/10.1038/nm.4133
Because that would be wrong. Publishers need hot tubs in their 3rd bathrooms, just like Deans and coaches do.
The methods section is included in that version (papers without methods are like dehydrated water). Read it for yourself, don't listen to some blowhard on the Interwebs (i.e., me).
Granted Nat Med is not as demanding re: reproducibility as say eLife or Bioinformatics, but they're not complete shits like Cell Press either. Ask the authors to open the Cytobank data if they haven't. I don't see why they wouldn't.
Not a very strong statement ;)
i like that the cytof is getting more popular, but people need to understand that the logistical commitment and jankiness of the system means that it should really only be used for its greatest strength: simultaneous detection of 30 variables on a small scale basis.
but yes, reading more carefully, I suppose you're right. Then again, orthogonal validation is not a bad thing.
The study seems very well-constructed and powerful. They demonstrate that direct stimulation of reward neuralchemistry produces specific and varied immune system responses, and also discover the pathways for this effect. They demonstrate causality well and also show that if the specific pathway they identify (the sympathetic nervous system connecting to lymphatic cells) is blocked, the increased immunological response no longer follows the neural reward stimulation. This seems really, really well done and it's high-impact science.
Upon reading the study, I wondered what might have created this mind-body link, in evolutionary terms. It turns out the authors considered this question as well. From the SciHub piece on this paper: "Many activities that are known to stimulate reward-system signaling in the VTA, including engaging in sex, socializing and traveling, markedly increase exposure to pathogens. Therefore, it can be envisioned, as the authors suggest, that coupling the reward center to the immune system would offer a selective advantage, which helps to explain the intertwining of these two systems from an evolutionary perspective."
Really cool stuff!
Perhaps this sub-system extends to people (unknowingly) "outing" themselves to other instances of the sub-system--should they become something akin to free radicals, or a negative factor to it.
Nature: http://www.nature.com.ezproxy.cul.columbia.edu/nm/journal/v2...
Here's a link I could grab before the edit window closed; http://www.apa.org/research/action/immune.aspx
As for jobs, well I tend to be underemployed. Its hard to find companies with vision who are not fun by fools. The upside to that is it leaves me more time to work at my passion!
Getting medicine treatment -> Rewards the brain -> Leads to increased production of antibodies -> Patient is healthier.
My imagination is running wild at the moment..