Okay, but what does that have to do with the article? It brings nothing to the table.
Of course we should innovate and keep bringing costs of everything down; this will happen with or without city planning.
Of course we should innovate and keep bringing costs of everything down; this will happen with or without city planning.
EDIT:
The only three resources that have been inflating in cost are real estate (can be fixed with policy), education, and healthcare. Those last two can also have their costs driven down with technology.
It's first principles all the way down.
For instance it basically says that a largely fixed dollar amount that doesn't vary that much by house, electricity consumption, looks large if you make $10,000 a year but looks tiny if you make $100,000 a year.
http://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/these-tiny-hou...