Hacker News Reader

Comment by _uhtu | Hacker News Reader

My biggest concern if i were to try to use Crystal in production would be the lack of "googleability". I'm guessing your team is very familiar with the language, so it's not as much of a problem that you can't Google a problem when it happens. Do you feel that this is a major roadblock for people new to crystal, or are the majority of errors very intuitive? the second thing is that according to the site crystal is in alpha and making breaking changes sometimes. how often do you have to refactor after an update and how difficult has it been to spot and fix that something is broken by an upgrade? Very interested in using it myself but can't bring myself to commit an app to it.

View on HN

These are really nice questions / concerns.

- Firstly, we are a Ruby shop and most of the time the errors are pretty self descriptive that we can easily solve. Also the IRC/Gitter room is full of helpful people that you can get instant feedback about any issue (even a compiler bug). Note that we're not afraid of writing code :)

- I've updated our application once in the last 6 months. It's only a minor change for adding type annotations which took like 10 minutes.

- Actually i think that Crystal is already in beta quality (for us). Calling it Alpha is really an understatement.

Thanks for answering!

I feel like Crystal is one of the best projects out there but it's not getting much attention. What do you think it will take to get people to start writing projects and contributing?

IMO the number one thing will be to start getting as many articles like this out as possible, and go beyond that. TodoMVC/Yelp Clone tutorials would go a LONG way I think, especially since a lot of people will just fork those projects to mess around in them.

Chiming in re. "googleability", go has the same problem (despite coming from Google :D). What you do is always search for 'crystal lang xxx'. It will get better as adoption increases.

I think OP isn't referring to the name but the fact that there are no results.

I was more just talking about how as language popularity goes up so does your likelihood of finding the solution to any given problem on the internet.

Just to add on that breaking changes are always compile errors, with a nice description of what you need to do to fix it, which makes the breaking changes a lot more manageable.

That's good! It's always frustrating trying to find a breaking change in an interpreted language, so I can imagine it would be much easier in Crystal.

googleability: imagine kemal was called meth.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com