“Turkey coup plotters' use of 'amateur' app helped unveil their network”
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
Extreme security with your fingerprint . Your fingerprint encrypts your call. Use this application for secure communication. This application uses industry leading encryption techniques .. Super Secure Free Calls available
TFA states that the app author was listed as 'David Keynes of Beaverton, Oregon'. Looking at the text from the author's Wordpress site [2] and app description, one could possibly come to the conclusion that the author is not a native english speaker (or has substandard grammar skills). 'David Keynes' a non native english speaker? Putting that together with claims of 'Super Secure Free Calls'. Something doesn't add up here..
[1] https://apkpure.com/bylock-secure-chat-talk/net.client.by.lo...
[1] https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=2014-01-01%202016...
[2] https://twitter.com/search?q=%22bylock%22%20lang%3Atr%20sinc...
another(from a gulenist it seems) says, guys don't use the same app for communications over and over, try to be more diverse (talk about an app called kakao)
Obviously, this app was known by public. So, I am not sure if they would risk themselves to use it to plan something illegal. Yet, things in Turkey are getting very amateurish in every aspects for the last decade. So, luckily for the sake of bits and pieces of Turkish democracy, this coup attempt was also amateurish.
However; I have the tendency to believe that Erdoğan knew that they were working on something nasty and he might had even encouraged it indirectly. So that, he could control it and benefit from it.
I must say that I have biased opinions against Erdoğan.
*@pazartesi2014 says
@kuscusencer ByLock programınıda umarım çözmüssünüzdür Reis paralelciler buna sardılar şimdi
--
@kuscusencer I hope you have decrypted the ByLock app, Reis (an informal expression, meaning superior). Gulenci People have started use this.
And this guy seems like from the movement
@nifaksavar
Arkadaslar sürekli aynı servis sağlayıcıyı kullanmayın bylock kakao vb..
---
Friends, don't always use the same service provider bylock, kakao etc..
This sort of thing kinda lends credence to that sort of idea.
Having said that, I stayed up watching the whole thing, and it never felt very real. There's no way you're going to fire on people in the streets with a helicopter but not shoot down the president's plane. Hell, they didn't even arrest the Parliament.
Not the craziest thing to say he would setup a coup against himself.
What I'm wondering is where things go from here and if anyone can do anything about it. I'm guessing the likes of the NSA probably have some info on who did what if they feel like using it.
Besides, there are sensible explanations why his plane was not shut down etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Turkish_coup_d%27%C3%A9ta...
No, that kind of group think is a consequence of not having proper freedom of press and proper freedom of association in the country. Which in turn is a consequence of voting for Erdogan (even if not everything was roses on that front before Erdogan, to be fair).
> That is a consequence they should have been thought of before being involved with a coup.
The teachers and other of the movement that wasn't involved in any wrongdoing are still part of those getting hit by the witch hunt.
As for businesses being threatened, how many media businesses have been closed by Erdogan? Free press is not optional for something that claims itself to be a democracy. Turkey is worst in class in that department, and as long as that is the case, whatever people support doesn't really matter, because the leader can dictate what news they see (or not).
>"As for businesses being threatened, how many media businesses have been closed by Erdogan?"
Erdogan and Gulen organisation in police and in judicial system done those things together. Every trial that is against Gulen's opponents contamined with fabricated proofs.
>"Turkey is worst in class in that department"
I sadly agree with you.
>"whatever people support doesn't really matter, because the leader can dictate what news they see (or not)."
Things are a bit complicated than that in Turkey. Most of the people hated Gulen's organisation before 2013, where Erdogan and Gulen media protected and praised him. Also other political parties support Erdogan in this case...
There's also the little thing that they used to be on Erdogan's side, too, and helped him purge the military of officers who might topple him. Check out operation sledgehammer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sledgehammer_(coup_plan)
After their break-up with AKP, when the corruption scandals showed up, the movement quickly became the scapegoat of the ruling party, accused of having formed a "parallel statal system". IDK if Gulen himself organised this coup (how can I know), but I can say that, reasoning on the Turkish public's view of the movement, including third party stories I've heard over the years (tho I've never met a member), they certainly have the network, hierarchy and the power to do it. It may also be someone in their hierarchy below Gulen that organised it. Time will show us the reality, I think.
Interesting tidbit: The officials who went to kill/capture Erdogan was told the group of soldires that they were to "pick up a high level PKK operative (A Kurdish terrorist organisation) in Marmaris." http://www.milliyet.com.tr/-gerekirse-olun-ama-gundem-228033...
Gulen shot my dog.
I think liberals and the liberal media are picking sides here, and they shouldn't be. Erdogan's vision of Turkey is far more secular and liberal than what the Gulenist movement wants. Turkey seems in better hands with the current leadership, which wins elections and is a strong NATO partner, compared building another middle-east theocracy. Like most politics, its a case of the lesser evil. I'm not exactly sure what liberals think is possible in Turkey, but migrating to a UK or French level of liberalism in what's a highly religious and conservative country isn't realistic. Even if it was, guys like Gulen aren't going to get you there.
This is a bit like leaving Catholicism to become a Scientologist. You're better off staying Catholic and trying to reform the church from within.
On the other hand Erdogan is racing to world #1 in closing news outlets, throwing reporters in jail, threatening anyone who speaks against him and so on.
Or are you saying that the Turkish people don't have a right to self-determiniation and elites like yourself should prescribe who their leaders are? Liberals decry overthrowing Iran and other governments, but here they are, pleading to overthrow Turkey. Its bizarre.
How about letting the democratic process work itself out and stop murdering civilians?
Or are you talking about the GTA IV cheat codes they found that definitely prove it?
I think I might take a closer look: if Matt Green found this app entertainingly bad, even though I'd never heard of it before today, that makes me a little curious.
I'll probably announce if there are any clear signs, but Matt seemed to have not found any, and that wouldn't surprise me: attribution is rarely easy and caution always needs to be borne in mind as to accuracy - especially when it comes to trying to tell apart intentional awfulness (happily, rare - but not completely unheard of) from genuine amateur hour (sadly, all-too-common).
As a clever attacker who wanted a backdoored app could well just deliberately outsource it to someone cluelessly inept, for that authentic (and, incidentally, ultra-cheap) feel, there's an element of Poe's law at hand: how do you ultimately know?
However somewhat foreign press is trying hard to see it other way. Many foreign journalists even supported the coup instead of condemning until failure is imminent. Some reasons can be that they just dislike the current president and often their information sources are people who are affiliated with the cleric's movement.
Clearly this coup attempt gave a golden opportunity to the president to purge Gulen followers from the state and nobody is denying this. But that is the expected behavior, whether or not it is justified. To me, Gulen and his upper hierarchy just blindly pushed all their low rank followers to the fire (most probably did not have a clue about the coup).
The problem is about prosecuting 99000 teachers, academics, and other "inconvenient" people, without much more than a hint that they do not like you or that they make fun of your similarity with Golum.
However this Doesn't mean that particular groups was not involved or took the initiative, I hope more will be revealed in time.
If "Gulen's people" existed in government then they would have a police run coup with a thin veneer of military. They would also keep as much from the military as possible since they are the type of trash the military takes out whenever it is in cleanup mode.
Gulen is pretty obviously Erodogan's version of a US vice president. A stupider version of himself that no one wants and stays a threat if the president is removed by force.
Ok, so then the people Erdogan moved into the military between 2010 and 2013 they were these remaining Gulen supporters in government that are intent on destroying the republic? Or he decided not to out existing Gulen supporters he helped sneak in to the military before 2010 to either his new or its past republican leadership, (which would happily contain or remove such elements.)
None of this makes any sense unless he is admitting that he was an element of a religious group's conspiracy to corrupt the republic until 2013 and now also thinks his own continuation of power is more important than whatever religious beliefs he feels trump the republic. (A republic can't matter to a conspirator against it, right?)
That sounds like it would be slight if someone other than Erdogan said it about him and a terrible official position for a president of a republic. So what is his official position on the past that makes sense with all of this data about a Gulen lead conspiracy to destroy the Turkish Republic that began "decades before" their 2013 split?
"Rabbimden af milletimden özür diliyorum dedim. Çünkü burada hata yapmışız."
"I said that I apologize to my nation, ask for forgiveness from my god. Because we made a mistake here."
Gulen's organisation is older, they started to recruit people to state positions starting from 1970's. Erdogan and Gulen supported each other after 2002 election. Both benefited from this partnership at that time. Especially after Ergenekon trials, the army lost the ability to clean Gulen supporters. The organisation spread like a virus, capturing key positions faster.
As the remaining uneaten pie got smaller, they realized the country is not big enough for two of them(2011-2013). I think that too much centralized power is a bad thing. Something like checks and balances is needed in Turkey. However at this point it is better for a selected goverment to be in power than a secretive ponzi-scheme-like organisation(lesser evil mindset). Ironically Erdogan says now: "we were deceived". Other political parties say: "what if you get deceived again?".
If you are interested there are more info on the background of events in some wiki pages:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sledgehammer_(coup_plan)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergenekon_trials
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_corruption_scandal_in_Tur...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Imam%27s_Army
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_government_%E2%80%93_G...
Bargain, sure... No beating, no electro-shocks, no sleep deprivation. They just ask politely and show a little friendliness. Right.
If they have material evidence, what's the use of a "confession"? If they don't, there's something fishy already.
BTW, there obviously WAS some sort of coup or "coup". But who pulled the strings, what were the intentions, and, most importantly, were all those tens and hundreds of thousands people involved is completely fishy, judging by the news, and especially official news from Turkey.
oh and what happened to the stories of his son trading oil with ISIS, and his daughter building hospitals to treat wounded ISIS mercenaries?
3 years ago I visited turkey, it seemed like nice country with nice people, but these days I only wish it would be further away from Europe. and to think such a place wanted to join EU...
Erdogan even sues comedians abroad for telling a joke.. I really hope he never enters as eu member, it shouldn't be on the table in the first place.
Turkey isn't the same any more.
On the other hand joking, criticizing and insulting different things and Germany actually prosecuted the comedian for that event. So in that sense German legal system thinks Erdogan is right, and he only used his legal rights?
I enjoy watching US political debates and as far as I can see they are free to insult everyone. Sometimes that brings color to conversation and I wish we had more freedom to insult in Turkey.
For the EU membership, I have complicated feelings. When I look from the perspective of EU. I don't know what will Turkey bring to EU? Opportunities or risks? Probably both. They may not want to deal with minor or major problems Turkey brings and that is OK. As a Turkish citizen and a curious person for different cultures, I would love to experience and learn from what EU brings.
Maybe I just can't sense the boiling, maybe we got used to getting shocked... But Turkey feels the same at everyday life.
Though it wouldn't surprise me if Erdogan had one or two people try to stir things a bit like the Syria false flag idea (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-03-27/here-youtube-false-...)
Turkish Television shows secret codes from the coup which are actually GTA IV Cheat Codes
http://i.imgur.com/D96MaPw.gifv
I'm not sure stories from the region are always accurate....
And now, they started using another app byLock? This smells like another attempt at falsifying data and diversion, which IMHO means they are creating false evidence for apprehending people they deem rivals. Currently there is an ongoing witch hunt in Turkey.
You sound like you read the Wikipedia page last week.
But now, the coup needs a way to communicate. E-mail's because we know it's insecure. Now what? You research, and find this app, and then....
Feel like this isn't very actionable advice.
As one of the other commenters said, WhatsApp and Signal still rely on third parties to host the system. But doesn't Signal simply have each device generate a private key that it claims it never knows about so even if the Signal server were hacked it still wouldn't compromise existing keys?
PGP (or Keybase.io) seems like too much work for non-techies.
I'm not as familiar with Telegram.
In the end, could you do any better than a trusted third party providing a protocol it claims generates keys on your device and doesn't share them?
It really depends on who you are trying to depose. I wouldn't trust any device if you were going against the interests of America / NATO, there are just too many opportunities for side channels. Likewise if it were using Chinese hardware against China. Assume you're compromised in either situation regardless of how secure your encryption seems to be.
Article from 2015 talking about phones shipping from Chinese manufacturers with backdoors already installed:
26 Android Phone Models Shipped with Pre-Installed Spyware
http://thehackernews.com/2015/09/android-smartphone-malware....
Shut the fuck up and wait for instruction.
When you're in the conspiracy stage, you need a cell like structure to protect the conspiracy against double agents and detection.
When you go live, you decapitate the local flavor of secret police, arrest the leader, and start rounding up or killing the key players.
Then talk.
There's the problem, nowadays when you go live you'd have to be able to move faster than the electrons that communicate that something is happening.
Which means you need to first remove or impair your target's means of communication, which means you need to go live before taking action.
It's turtles all the way down.
But I fully agree with your subtext: it's not a technical problem.
A modern, digital scheme similar to this is called 'chaffing and winnowing' [2]. Both are steganography rather than encryption, but the intent is the same -- to communicate securely over an insecure channel.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_cipher [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaffing_and_winnowing
But remember that Turkey is a NATO ally, so you're up against the NSA, CIA and MI6 for starters (in addition to the fine intelligence service of Turkey).
So I would think that Signal would have to hand out all registered phone numbers in Turkey - a list which could be checked against all military personnel. Given that they've detained thousands of teachers, I don't think they'd be above detaining thousands of suspected troops, even at the risk of waterboarding loyalists.
You don't need an accurate list, just some help "short listing" people.
Similar issue with Tor - if you're in the military and your mobile device used Tor before/during the coup, you'd be on a watch-list (or shot).
The best op-sec is the terrorist/stay-behind/contras: small independent cells, with no knowledge or communication with each other. Obviously some plan is needed to set up a command and control structure when the coup is "won". I don't think there are any great solutions here, that also doesn't leak enough meta-data to get you tortured and killed in the event of a failed coup.
Signal also had some sort of work towards preventing contact list disclosure.
At a state level, there's also traffic analysis. If you find Target A then look at their traffic, you might be able to time-coordinate messages sent to other users. (Target->Signal Servers->Recipient)
Guess they could take the Signal source and run their own copy of it, too, eh? I'd also add a time-based auto-wipe function to Signal, which is useful if your are suddenly captured. Doing it by hand is tedious, so people don't. Signal doesn't do this because they don't want people to think it implements a secure remote wipe. But they should consider the problem of an activist having their phone recovered. If the app would delete on time, it'd mitigate some damage.
Telegram shouldn't be touched.
OTR messaging is encrypted (only intended recipients can read your messages), authenticated (you can verify intended recipients identity), deniable (anyone can forge messages after a conversation to look like you sent them), and forward-secret (if you loose your keys, previous conversations aren't compromised).
Also, it is wise to communicate as little as possible. Chatter can be detected to see who are involved. It often doesn't matter what you said, if you were involved or engaged with the wrong people, you may find yourself zip-tied in a stress position.
http://i.imgur.com/D96MaPw.gifv
I wonder how much this Guardian article have cost.
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/mp-paid-by-group-linked-to...
Do you have a secret agenda? What is your evidence or reasonning for such a claim?
This discussion highlights how important it is that the normal messaging applications we use on daily basis become secure and protect the messages and identities of those communicating. This is not because you or I have something to hide or protect, but because other people in other countries do. And in order to keep themselves under the radar, they need to be using the same tools as we do.
The generals involved surely had secure means of communication which isn't logged, or at least knew what not to use, in case they want to deny events.
Using a random messaging app, believing that it's encrypted, and that being enough, is very naive.
I'm also skeptical that a conspiracy involving thousands of individuals (all using this one app) somehow didn't leak until after the coup? The answer is probably that the purges didn't really have anything to do with the coup.
But it is all in the PR of the after party.
Next time either don't use technology or study a bit about the software security first before using it as a main communication channel.
You may be on to something there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUBUInQK2us
till the end if you can.