It's not benevolent, that's pure propaganda at work. It's a nation that acts in its own interests like any other. It just disguises them extremely well.
Have you asked the people of Libya, Iraq and Syria what their world would be like without the USA?
Bullshit defense. There has never been a period in history with fewer wars and proportionally lower fatality rates due to violence. The existence of war at all does not somehow invalidate the value of American hegemony.
How long is your time frame? Many more people have died after Sep. 2001 than in the decades prior.
> The existence of war at all does not somehow invalidate the value of American hegemony.
What you seem to forget or don't realize is that the wars of the last decade are a direct result of what we're doing to maintain that American hegemony. So while it's been good for you because you're watching the wars on TV and reading it on the Internet, it's been very bad for those on whose land the wars are being fought.
That just isn't true at all[1]. Since the end of the Second Congo War[3] (in 2003) there hasn't been a conflict that's come close to 1MM causalities.
While the Iraq, Afghan and Syrian wars have been brutal and very well publicised they haven't been anywhere near as severe in terms of causalities.
(Don't take this as a comment either way on US policies though)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:List_of_wars_by_death_tol...
[2] http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/globally-deaths-war...
The US has big issues and internal ideological conflicts and many inconsistencies, for sure. But, if you randomly sample the population you'll find that most of us want peace, freedom, success and happiness for everyone.
It's a shame that doesn't come across in US foreign and economic policies.
Once upon a time, the British Empire took it upon itself to civilize the uncivilized world, bringing heavy-handed order in many faraway 'nasty, brutish' places for queen and country. The sun has since set on the British Empire, and yet the world is doing just fine. Empires rise and they fall all the time.
> They aren't destroying the credit ratings of political dissenters.
You should probably listen to this talk.
https://media.ccc.de/v/32c3-7443-the_price_of_dissent
While it's primarily about the UK, the USGOV is defiantly involved.
(note: I trust that this crowd is mature enough to not let Applebaum's introduction taint the important message by the actual speakers)
Only killing people on the other side of the world with drones. And if the wrong people are killed, well, 'shit happens', let's just call those dead innocents 'collateral damage'.
> There are times I wish the US would disengage from the world so humanity can be reminded of what its like to live without a generally benevolent hegemonic power.
You should be made aware that the US isn't being a 'generally benevolent hegemonic power' out of the goodness of it's heart. It's doing so to protect its political and economic interests.
By all means, elect Trump, and secede back into isolationism. It's going to suck for you as well, as all that economic power you get from sweetheart deals from your military projection? It's going to fade away. As for foreign aid, US foreign aid is, per capita, well below that of other western democracies.
It's always amusing when USians pretend like they're doing the world an altruistic favour by being 'world cop', when in reality they get plenty of kickbacks. Ask yourself this: if the US was really the 'altruistic world cop', then why does it ignore so many trouble spots?
Sure, we're not jailing Twitter dissidents, but do you know what we do to whistleblowers? One of our whistleblowers has been forced to take up residence in Russia.
Of course we're not sniping protesters from rooftops, but our friends do it when we egg them on to further our interests in foreign lands.
C'mon, aim higher. You're supposed to be in the big leagues now, compare yourself to developed countries if you want to see how well the USGOV is doing.