Win10 tries really hard to make you log into your desktop with your Live Account credentials - you can't use the store without this. Whereas if it were just leaking a local login it would be much less critical.
Win10 tries really hard to make you log into your desktop with your Live Account credentials - you can't use the store without this. Whereas if it were just leaking a local login it would be much less critical.
But yes, I am quite annoyed by them requiring that I use online credentials to log in to a physical computer. I prefer to separate the two authentication mechanisms.
In one case, I unsuccessfully tried to create just a local account in Win 8, because they had hidden it behind 3+ layers of "sign in here with your live account". I was sure that there must be a way to create a local one, but just couldn't find the right path.
I for one am glad that the French Data Protection Authority is going after Microsoft, but it remains to be seen if it can lead to major changes in Windows 10 (for the benefit of the users):
https://www.cnil.fr/en/windows-10-cnil-publicly-serves-forma...
Call me old fashioned, but I prefer my login credentials to my physical PC to be different than for my online accounts.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/13951/windows-creat...
(I had a Windows 8 VM for compiling some software and used a local account.)
It involves navigating to a "Create a Microsoft Account" screen, and then clicking the well-hidden "Sign in without a Microsoft Account" at the bottom. Quite a well thought out dark pattern, confused me at the time.
[1] http://www.hanselman.com/blog/HowToSignIntoWindows8Or81Witho...
Pushing the MS Account for installing software is plain bad and it definitely won't help with user adoption like a non mandatory account would.
Is that substantially different from every corporate domain login credential system?
I have downloaded Netflix, Audible, tubecast and a whole bunch of other apps from the store
and so far, all is good. fingers cross ;)
The built-in weather app and tile is solid enough that I find people downloading a third party one kinda surprising.
http://lifehacker.com/install-windows-10-store-apps-without-...
I genuinely cannot imagine the day that I want a thing and go to the windows store to get it. Last night I installed AutoHotKey and Notepad++ for example (both long overdue admittedly) - all through my browser. Simplez.
It's not really a surprise if an app store needs an account. Are there any that don't?
Also nearly any Linux package manager ;) (if they count as an "app store" for you)
Isn't it possible to buy something in the Windows Store and login just for this one purchase? Note sure though, but I think I remember doing that with Windows 8.
Yeah the ones that have existed since forever: GNU/Linux repositories (Ubuntu's, Debian's, etc.). Even Ubuntu's Software Center, which you might find closer to an app store than a command line interface even though it's the same thing, does not require an account until you try to leave comments or review an application.
Then there were browser addon repositories which worked the same way, first from Firefox and later from all other browsers. (Except one of course.)
So yes, no account was the standard. Needing an account is something recent.
I'd just like to download apk files from the play store, but that's not possible without an account even though there's no reason for it whatsoever. Moreover, I'd like to contribute to many apps while still not attaching payment info to my account. Currently I bought some pro versions of apps via gift cards, but this doesn't work for subscriptions (even if you have 100 bucks prepaid on your account and the subscription is 1 buck a month, and don't get me started on country locking the credit). They all want to have your data and lock you in.
In Windows 10's case, it's only for apps. If you're happy with Win32 programs, you still don't need to use a Microsoft Account.
Did you actually use Windows 10 you're complaining about?
I'm complaining about walled gardens and application "stores" that require an account in particular, even when they don't require payment information (making them not a store at all, just a walled application garden).
And yes, I have used the Windows Store once or twice, but I don't see how that changes anything.
I borrow books and CDs from a public library: I need an account.
I borrow videos from BlockBuster or stream them from Netflix: I need an account.
I want to comment on HN or whatever: I need an account.
I want to get a job, I need an account (SSN etc).
Want to borrow a book from another library because it's missing in yours?
Want to switch from Netflix to a different streaming provider, but don't want to lose all your history?
You can't easily because you're in their walled garden.
The Windows Store or also the Play Store and Apple's App Store could function without account for free apps, too, as far as I understand it they just choose to require an account up-front, so that there's less friction in the moment a user considers buying an app.
Being honest, what would I want to use the store for?
1) Convenience: You don't have to search all over the web for your software and don't have to click through an installer when installing (because everything is packaged in a standardized way and can therefore be installed in a standardized way, too). Also, there's a centralized way of distributing updates now, meaning that not anymore each and every piece of software has to come with an auto-updater.
2) Security: If you don't install your stuff from the internet, you're also much less likely to install from a wrong source and therefore less likely to catch viruses. If there is a virus-infected app on the Windows Store, it's also possible for Microsoft to remove it. The UWP-apps that Microsoft is pushing along with their store, are also sandboxed, so again, much less likely for software to be able to damage your system.