> (edit: I said the article didn't mention. I missed the mention.)
Amazing your comment is top—given you didn't read the article.
> The man deserved what he got
From what I've seen (I'm no expert on the subject), that's debatable.
Amazing your comment is top—given you didn't read the article.
> The man deserved what he got
From what I've seen (I'm no expert on the subject), that's debatable.
A lot of people here just are snapping to criticize over this, which is oddly reminiscent of a subtext of the article, not doing this comment section any favors, and specifically discussed in the HN guidelines.
Now that I've made a substantive comment: who cares, seriously?