See the attempts by NYC to set up congestion pricing but Albany won't allow it happen.[1]
Personally I think other cities will start this first such as London, LA, Paris, etc.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congestion_pricing_in_New_York...
See the attempts by NYC to set up congestion pricing but Albany won't allow it happen.[1]
Personally I think other cities will start this first such as London, LA, Paris, etc.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congestion_pricing_in_New_York...
Prices are between $0 and $5 depending on the time and day.
Just saying that NYC tried to have congestion pricing only to be overruled. And I'm sure they'll aim for eTrucks only requirement but will be overruled by Albany because that's what Albany does.
And that other cities (Stockholm I'm sure) will be at the forefront of the new eTruck revolution as soon as it's commercially viable.
Same for CA and SV, MA and Boston, IL and Chicago. In states with one dominant city that city runs the show for the most part. If the dominant city can't get something done it's either because it's BS and shouldn't get done in the first place, would screw most of the rest of the state or because they need to wait to politically recharge after ramming something that fell into one of the former two categories down everyone's throat.
You speak like someone who doesn't follow NY politics.