Are Some Startups More Worthwhile Than Others?
socialentrepreneurship.change.org
socialentrepreneurship.change.org
Microsoft was started to write software for the Altair.
Apple was started to make personal computers when personal computers were considered less useful and marketable than calculators.
Google was started to make a minor improvement to search technology.
IBM was founded to tabulate census data.
Sony started as a radio repair shop.
Oracle was started out of a failed CIA contracting gig.
My point being, it's hard to tell beforehand what a "worthwhile" startup is. Often the founders end up solving a problem they didn't know they were working on. Sometimes, even when they solve a problem they thought was trivial and only interesting to themselves, they open up vast new frontiers of human knowledge through sheer serendipity.
It's very akin to the last mile problem. At some point you have to stop working with bits, and start working with atoms.
I'll keep it going, what else influences how HN members have decided what type of companies to build?