Boltzmann Brain
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Recommended, it's a very interesting reading.
Happy Birthday, everyone!
What I find more interesting is if we're a random fluctuation on a Turing machine tape. "Randomness" takes a lot of space to encode in a program, so smaller (more likely) programs lead to less random, more structured outputs. This agrees with our observations.
You've missed the point of Boltzmann brains. No one who studies this stuff thinks we're a Boltzmann brain. The question is whether we can rule out theories that predict Boltzmann brains as the numerically dominant observer with our observations. Indeed, many very popular theories of cosmology (e.g., eternal inflation) are in apparent conflict here.
In the philosophy literature, this often is framed in terms of a choice between the self-indication assumption or the self-sampling assumption.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-sampling_assumption
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-indication_assumption
The canonical reference on this is Bostrom.
https://www.amazon.com/Anthropic-Bias-Observation-Selection-...
In the physics literature, this has been discussed as the assumption of "typicality".
http://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.123... http://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123... http://arxiv.org/abs/0707.4169 http://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.023...
Hartle and Srednicki's thought experiment involving the Jovians is a form of the presumptuous philosopher argument.
Heck, your moment-to-moment experience of being in a room is extremely unlikely compared to just a temporary Boltzmann brain hallucination upon arrival. No need to go find a door, just wait 10 milliseconds for the "Oh wait actually I'm in space and about to die" sense information to start pouring in. Oh it didn't happen? That's just because you only arrived a millisecond ago and have fake memories of it not happening and are still in the hallucination phase... (repeat indefinitely).
This moment-by-moment thing is what makes Boltzmann brains such a paradox in terms of epistemology. In a cosmology with Boltzmann brains, most of the entities who've just made some conclusion about Boltzmann brains are themselves Boltzmann brains.
> A Boltzmann brain is a hypothesized self aware entity which arises due to random fluctuations out of a state of chaos.
This is really strange. Years ago I wrote a short story about a similar topic, without ever having read about the Boltzmann brain:
"History of Everything"