Hacker News Reader

Comment by Jtsummers | Hacker News Reader

May not survive, but it's really their application that's patented. You can patent inventions and processes (how software patents came into being, and also how someone patented a "method for exercising cats" - a laser pointer mounted to a platform that moved it randomly).

View on HN

In some countries you can't patent formulas or processes or even ideas...

And, IMO, that's how it should be in the US. But it's not, not yet at least.

In which countries? Seems like this particular patent is in the EU so that rules out the EU countries...

In India you can't patent software. It has to be hardware related. Indian Patent Office issued it this year.

Except that system can be counteracted by describing a CPU and then describing an algorithm. Richard Stallman had a talk about patents and mentioned the Indian system.

Can you please link the video?

It's this one I believe. I don't have a timestamp (and don't have 2 hours to go through it to find it), though I believe it is a response to a question at the very end. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiKRt3-FbM0

Ideas aren't patentable at all.

In no country I guess. You have to transform your idea in something more concrete first. A piece of hardware, a process, a composition of matter you name it.

Imagine all those stupid ideas from just lying in the bed and thinking about being patented. Nothing would have been created but everything would have been patented. That's worse than patenting a formula or a piece of software.

One can argue that that thought requires effort as well as a number of other preconditions which are not guaranteed to occur without heavy investment. Not all ideas are equal. Some ideas may be just a mindless combination that can be otherwise obtained from a machinal set up, whereas others can be the result of years of work or of some genius visionary. What I consider necessary is a rating system and a qualification threshold for what is worth to be considered a thing that can be claimed and what can not. I'm aware that a deep rabbit hole is opening here around this issue, but the question is if it's worth having it nevertheless compared to what we have now.

> also how someone patented a "method for exercising cats"

It appears that USPTO has issued it several times [0]:

  6505576 Pet Toy
  6557495 Laser Pet Toy
  6651591 Automatic laser pet toy and exerciser
  6701872 Method and apparatus for automatically exercising a curious animal

[0] http://www.freepatentsonline.com/crazy.html

Idea, which is 50/50 art and political action: we patent a method for submitting patents, involving computers and the internet. It acts to block people from submitting new patents and so bring the whole irrationality of the US patent system to the foreground.

Ducking Genius!

Reply on news.ycombinator.com