Vim is better than emacs

Sorry for being off-topic, but...

These are neat and all, but this is the third arguman.org link I've clicked this week from HN. If we're going to have a healthy discussion/debate about a topic, why not have it here? To me, debates on arguman.org come across as endless one-upsmanship rather than an actual discussion.

Maybe arguman.org posts should be rolled up as "hey, look at this neat argument analysis site" and link to its main page.

One of the reasons it's better is that it's slim and you can find it on just about every linux box in the world. Stuck in Borneo with a linux box the local tribe has that not yet connected to the world until you create a script or edit some net config files? Vi is your tool. Emacs? Nowhere to be found.

emacs for editing/coding, vi for systems administration.

"The keybindings are not ergonomics at all."

Emacs is an editor construction kit. It can be vi, classic emacs, or something entirely different. vim bindings do feel efficient. I wish someone would take a crack at an even better/efficient editor.

This is a really cool system, but is there some sort of conclusion rollup? Thus far all I can see is that it helps logically organize two sides of a debate, though thus far it's not helping me see how valid the conclusion is.

Shorter to type, for starters.