Hacker News Reader

Comment by lmmlzxx | Hacker News Reader

I'm not knowledgeable about Bing, but Google doesn't support literal searches either if you mean that in the sense of exact string matching.

View on HN

If you append &tbs=li to the end of the query URL, google does a literal search.

If you want it as a default, add it to your browser as a search engine plugin: http://mycroftproject.com/search-engines.html?name=google+ve...

Or: Search tools → All results → Verbatim

I am trying this right now, and it's not doing exact string matching. I mean case sensitive, special characters, etc.

To the poster below, putting the query in double quotes definitely does not do exact string matching.

Of course Google supports exact string matching. Just put your term in double quotes.

Mind you, it's overloaded now; double quotes also mean "this term must appear in the results." Used to be that prefixing with + meant that, but they killed that function so they could use it for Google Plus. You used to be able to search for, say, "annie oakley" "wild bill hickok" and find pages with either or both of those complete phrases; now there's no obvious way to do that.

Many years ago, IIRC, Google Search also supported boolean AND/OR, but that was also removed, for no obvious reason.

Probably because it produces confusing effects when people type in full sentences.

That wouldn't prevent them from denoting booleans with special characters (which they already do with other functions--see https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/2466433?hl=en), or having some kind of "advanced" interface. As far as I've been able to tell, boolean searches have been entirely removed from Google's public-facing search. There was no need to do that.

It feels like they haven't for a while, eg this http://i.imgur.com/zEDt5tD.png

People have had this misconception for a long time about Google, I remember having this debate on HN 4 or 5 years ago. I'm not sure Google has ever supported truly exact string matching.

It still prioritizes exact string matches I think.

Nope - that does not do what you think it does.

It does. It's called verbatim mode, if I recall correctly.

Edit: verbatim not verbose

Reply on news.ycombinator.com