Every single story has to be sensational, has to be "crazy", or "unbelievable". Everything has to be a show with music, sound effects and cool teasers.
Every single story has to be sensational, has to be "crazy", or "unbelievable". Everything has to be a show with music, sound effects and cool teasers.
We have reporters on "respected" shows sensationalizing flooding in canoes! [1]
They love to divide us based on race, sex, whatever, but the data doesn't support their claims of crisis. And we gobble it up.
You don't have images, but you'd surprised how many things happen in the world at once...
(Live streams also exist, both "unofficially", and legally but geo-restricted on Livestation, apparently.)
PBS and NPR are the only American sources on TV I considered fairly comparable in tone and depth to news programs in other countries.
Currently there is a lot "lulz Trump", "wtf hillary" and "trololo brexit" in between. So it is a bit more sensationalized then else.
For another example, listen to news on your local NPR station. You might get a feel for the presenter's opinion, but most of the information is simply information. That is much more near the 'flavor' of news here.
The main news channel in France: http://www.bfmtv.com/mediaplayer/live-video/
Nowadays, there are more options: some news program air earlier (7pm for example), some are shorter (20minutes), etc. But the key is that there is no ads either in the middle or around the program. From my point of view, this is the difference that is driving this race to the sensational.
I know about BBC News in the UK, and in France, there are now 4, and soon, 5 (BFMtv, ITele, LCI, France 24, France Info).