Not sure if this is typical in my culture. Probably not to the extent of my personal attitude. I'm the weird guy who declared income from tutoring I was doing during my university years ;). I had two core sources for my thinking about those issues in my childhood - one was religious upbringing; I was raised in a belief that God likes it when you follow rules of secular powers unless they're in direct contradiction with the Bible. The other was growing up watching Star Trek, which taught me to assume things are better when people cooperate, bureaucracies can be competent, and rules that seem to make no sense to individual tend to have a lot of sense if you take a more global approach.

So this is where I come from. Even though I'm not a religious person anymore, over the years I thought a lot about the approach to the rules and oragnizations, and came to the conclusion that the society is better off if everyone follows the rules by default, suboptimal they may be, instead of rebelling whenever they feel like. Both because some rules are actually good even if they don't seem so, and for others, it's easier to change things when people are willing to cooperate and authorities aren't so busy fighting fires.

Back to the culture. For context, I'm from Europe, Poland. I meet a mix of various approaches. Some are law-abiding citizens. Most break laws here and there, but generally treat upholding them as a virtue and their behaviour as something not good, but done out of practical necessity. I don't encounter people glorifying law-breaking very often.

As for vigilantes from TV you mentioned in your previous comment, I like those shows like everyone else. Though I have to remind myself all the time that it's fiction - law enforcement isn't as incompetent as those shows always portray, and lot of the stuff heroes do aren't feasible in the real world. Then again, I'm still a Star Trek guy - I side with organizations made of good, competent, ethical people.